X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,1998dee0bb30b4b5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-23 15:07:44 PST Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!galaxy.ucr.edu!library.ucla.edu!news.mic.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!homer.cs.mcgill.ca!ian From: ian@cs.mcgill.ca (Ian Frederic STEWART) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: my so far un-figleted font... Date: 23 Mar 1994 23:07:44 GMT Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Lines: 31 Message-ID: <2mqi40$914@homer.cs.mcgill.ca> References: <2moo0o$2h6@jaws.cs.hmc.edu> <2mmhg7$aio@ivy.bga.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: marge.cs.mcgill.ca In article aq008@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Greg Webster) writes: > >In a previous article, psamuels@hmc.edu (Out of Order) says: >> >> _ _ __ _ __ __ ___ __ __ _ >>/| _) _) /_| |_ (__ _/ (__) (__) /.\ >>_|_ /__ __) | __) (__) / (__) __) \_/ >> >>Yuck. Can anyone redo the numbers? The 2, 6 and 9 are especially >>horrid. >> >I tend to like all or none of the numbers with tops, but the four seems >unresolved here...the one works better I think. 6 & 9 I like a bit better >now, the zero bugs me. Anyone else? > Greg. _ _ _ _ _ __ __ ___ __ __ __ /| '_) '_) |_| |__' (__' __/ (__) (__) (\ ) _|_ /__ ._) | .__) (__) / (__) .__) (_\) . __ or /_| ( ) | (__) Blip. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ### |Ian.Stewart,.U1.Rep.CSUS..ian@cs.mcgill.ca.Tel:737-0680......-####-?.d.@## |NO,.I'm.NOT.doing.anything.productive.today...Gotta.problem?.| |..!.| --------------------------------------------------------------- -+----