X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,1998dee0bb30b4b5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-23 01:59:11 PST Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Path: gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!aq008 From: aq008@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Greg Webster) Subject: Re: my so far un-figleted font... Message-ID: Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca Reply-To: aq008@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Greg Webster) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet References: <2moo0o$2h6@jaws.cs.hmc.edu> <2mmhg7$aio@ivy.bga.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 09:59:11 GMT Lines: 24 In a previous article, psamuels@hmc.edu (Out of Order) says: > > _ _ __ _ __ __ ___ __ __ _ >/| _) _) /_| |_ (__ _/ (__) (__) /.\ >_|_ /__ __) | __) (__) / (__) __) \_/ > >Yuck. Can anyone redo the numbers? The 2, 6 and 9 are especially >horrid. > I tend to like all or none of the numbers with tops, but the four seems unresolved here...the one works better I think. 6 & 9 I like a bit better now, the zero bugs me. Anyone else? Greg. -- _ _______( \________________________________________________ (_______| |_Greg Webster_aq008@freenet.carleton.ca_Ottawa__> (_/