X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,8e9d70b8827d2e78
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-06 04:06:00 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!warwick!news.coventry.ac.uk!news.coventry.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: ouz085@cck.coventry.ac.uk (J Murdock)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: viewing util - revdelay
Date: 3 Jun 1994 15:39:54 +0100
Organization: Coventry University
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <2snfbq$c1n@cc_sysk.coventry.ac.uk>
References: <CqL1u1.MGJ@newcastle.ac.uk> <CqL5p2.5r@newcastle.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cc_sysk.coventry.ac.uk
Keywords: Animation

In article <CqL5p2.5r@newcastle.ac.uk>,
C. Groom <C.Groom@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:
>Instructions:
>uudecode to get C-source, compile, rename executable to revdelay.

Hey! Bandwidth! (and we can't have people wasting badwidth,
it'll be ascii art in signatures next....).

What's wrong with posting the source as is?