X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ed94cfee62a5a06a,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-06 00:44:31 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee From: flee@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: LINE: flying disks Date: 06 Jun 1994 00:37:08 GMT Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <2sqp9u$p3u@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu Bob Allison: > Here's a very slight diddle. I just widened the CD and added the >label area to the 3.5 disk. > Also on the CD, I tried to make it have both dark and light bands. > _..--''| _ __ > - -= | 8 | - -= //\ - -= ,d8888b > | 8 | // /\ ,%%8888Po, > | .,-, | - -= ///\\/\ .d8%888Pd8b. > - -= | `-' | \\ \ / - -= :8888()8888: > | | - -= \\ // '898Pd8%888' > = | \\/ `Pd8888%%' > - - -= |_..--'' - - -= `Y8888P' The label's a good idea. It's now more recognizably a 3.5" disk. But I think the CD is now too wide. If it's tilted away at the same angle as the 5.25" disk, then since it's about the same height, it should be about the same width too. I guess it could be tilted at a different angle. I'm not sure the 5.25" disk and 3.5" disk are at the same angle. Hmm. Let me check. The 3.5" disk is 6 chars wide by 6 chars tall. This form can't be stretched easily either way, so this determines the shape of the other disks, assuming they're supposed to be at the same angle. The 5.25" disk is 9 chars wide by 7 chars tall. While I'm at it, I might as well check the relative sizes. A 3.5" disk has a diagonal length of about 4.95". So if 4.95" is 6 chars tall, then 5.25" should be 6.36 chars tall. 7 chars is reasonably close. (If I actually *had* any of these disks handy, I wouldn't have to do this math :) So the height of the 5.25" disk is fine, but the width is off. However, I can't draw the center hole if the disk is narrowed to 7 chars. Boy. All this work just to confirm what I instinctively drew. Actually, I think I just followed my memory of the original picture, which had about the same proportions. --