X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f7789,b6681c527a7f85f1,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf7789,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,b6681c527a7f85f1,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-25 17:21:19 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!remarque.berkeley.edu!mbkomor From: mbkomor@remarque.berkeley.edu (m.b.komor) Newsgroups: alt.fan.mike-jittlov,alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Meriday's ASCII Re: WoSaT origami - comments Date: 25 Jul 1994 22:35:29 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 61 Message-ID: <311enh$l08@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <1994Jul8.220204.25715@midway.uchicago.edu> <2vl8ic$jhp@news.csus.edu> <307v0m$t4@agate.berkeley.edu> <30bmdj$4os@news.csus.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu Summary: Proof Gharlane is More Innocent than Mike! Xref: nntp.gmd.de alt.fan.mike-jittlov:4549 alt.ascii-art:12789 In article <30bmdj$4os@news.csus.edu>, Gharlane of Eddore wrote: >In <307v0m$t4@agate.berkeley.edu> mbkomor@remarque.berkeley.edu > (m.b.komor) writes: >> In <2vl8ic$jhp@news.csus.edu>, >> Gharlane of Eddore wrote: >> [deleted] >> > I'm still waiting for a greyscale PS portrait of Meriday Beth, >> > preferably the original from which MJ's famous ASCII portrait is >> > derived..... >> >> Gharlane, there *is* no "original"-- Mike drew my portrait from *memory*. > >Don't be silly. In the portrait, you appear to have no clothing on. >*OUR* wizard would never expose his innocent eyes to the sight of an >unclothed lady, at least if he wasn't married, partnered, or handfasted >to her. Hmmm...[i thot i'd *never* run into anyone more `innocent' than Mike] Gharlane, i really don't know what to say to you about this... >Please don't besmirch the alabaster image of our Net.Saint by implying That's *GREEN*, Gharlane, a *GREEN* image. Gee. >that he would take advantage of a defenseless naked woman by looking at >her. Who says it was non-consensual? >Since you claim he did not work from a photograph, OBVIOUSLY the portrait >is *NOT* from memory, but rather from IMAGINATION. Jealous..? =DDDD >> Best, -Meriday Beth > >You keep claiming that. I think the flattery of Mike's ASCII portrait >has given you an ego problem...... No comment. Really. <*splutter*> mbkomor@remarque.berkeley.edu | @wiretap.spies.com & gneet@toys.fubarsys.com indigo@samsara.circus.com & umm@deeptht.armory.com <*still* laughing. -*thx*, gharlane, you've really made my day! :DDDD >