X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,535e80416e502a8c X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public X-Google-Thread: 10ffde,299d0bc3500e024c X-Google-Attributes: gid10ffde,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,535e80416e502a8c X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-01 23:13:16 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee From: flee@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee) Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,alt.ascii-art,sci.math Subject: Re: Art, math, realism, ascii (Re: PARASITES INSIDE OF VIRUSES?) Date: 02 Aug 1994 03:38:43 GMT Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <317jrc$ale@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <318qce$fna@jac.zko.dec.com> <31bdjr$ppn@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <31bp9n$a1h@riscsm.scripps.edu> <31e91i$5fk@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <31j4ev$i7t@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: colossus.cse.psu.edu Xref: bga.com alt.ascii-art:10803 sci.math:17344 Ludwig Plutonium: > Paintings, masterpieces, movies are visual art. We can define art as >resolution. We can define beauty in art as "intentions conveyed >visually". I think you're confused on several levels about the meaning and purpose of art. Today's silly example: "I wish to convey the essence of the dilemma that a Christian faces in attempting to reconcile a respect for the scientific worldview against a sincere religious conviction. I've narrowed it down to two possibilities: < and > Which is more optimal?" Besides that, I don't believe the purpose of art is to convey precise intentions. Jackson Pollack certainly wasn't being very precise when he splattered paint on a canvas by tossing it through a turbine. And if you start trying to figure out the precise pattern of paint splatters that optimally represents Pollack's intention, then you've missed the point entirely. --