X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ffde,299d0bc3500e024c X-Google-Attributes: gid10ffde,public X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,535e80416e502a8c X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,535e80416e502a8c X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-02 10:32:26 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee From: flee@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee) Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,alt.ascii-art,sci.math Subject: Re: Art, math, realism, ascii (Re: PARASITES INSIDE OF VIRUSES?) Date: 02 Aug 1994 17:30:50 GMT Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <318qce$fna@jac.zko.dec.com> <31bdjr$ppn@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <31bp9n$a1h@riscsm.scripps.edu> <31e91i$5fk@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <31lh4g$baf@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: colossus.cse.psu.edu Xref: bga.com alt.ascii-art:10817 sci.math:17372 Ludwig Plutonium: > Precisely, his canvas "intended" to fleece the public out of money. >All art has an intent. And that intent may be vague for even the artist >himself/herself. Our Maker 231PU superdetermines it. > And, that "intent" can switch as time goes by. When da Vinci did the >Mona Lisa, that female face was the highest dot per square cm >resolution of any painting on Earth. But now we can do better than >that. The highest resolution photograph of a beautiful female face >excels the Mona Lisa. But the intent of the Mona Lisa has now switched >from resolution of female face to big time money for auctioneers. Put >the best resolution photograph of a female human next to the Mona Lisa >into a museum of advanced aliens from another planet and the Mona Lisa >is second rate in comparison. Hmm. I think we're having semantic difficulties. You're using the word "intent" in a way I'm not familiar with. This "intent" that can change over time, is it a universal or is it something that varies subjectively? --