X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110f55,12f91f289fda8924,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,12f91f289fda8924,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-04-22 23:49:41 PST Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!psuvm!news.cac.psu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!giaeb!dljar1 From: dljar1@giaeb.cc.monash.edu.au (Dwayne Jarvis) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: Re: TALK - .Signature files Date: 23 Apr 94 06:49:41 GMT Organization: Monash University Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <2p7grm$hg9@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <2p8rvp$l0s@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: giaeb.cc.monash.edu.au X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #4 (NOV) > Well Glenn, just remember that some people see articles and sigs as >two separate things. I don't see such a big difference. Eitther one has >an equal opportunity to be entertaining and informative, or a big waste >of bandwidth. Although some sigs are certainly worthy of a posting, the big problem is the repeat factor. How many times have: roses, Beavis and Buthead, globe.vt, etc been posted, and everyone gets sick of seeing them over and over. The same goes for sigs. There's no denying that the globe.vt file was rather cool, but if it were to be attached to every single post by a certain person... Variety is the key! Row.