X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,9d9656d526f5c4f8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,9d9656d526f5c4f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-Thread: fd588,9d9656d526f5c4f8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd588,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-14 14:39:06 PST Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!chai From: spectre@uiuc.edu (Ian) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.ascii-art.animation,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: Re: *%*%*%*%*%*%*% CHINESE CHARACTERS *%*%*%*%*%*%*% Date: 14 Feb 1994 22:39:06 GMT Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 26 Message-ID: <2jouia$qa3@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> References: <2jc2s7$3b3@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> Reply-To: spectre@uiuc.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: uxh.cso.uiuc.edu Originator: chai@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu garland@biol.gis.queensu.ca (Wes Garland) writes: >Jeroen Nijhof (nijhof@th.rug.nl) wrote: >: Wing Lam Yip (umyip013@cc.umanitoba.ca) wrote: >: : I would like to keep some ASCII Chinese characters, but not those huge ones, >: Here's a small one :-) : >: /|\ >What a horrible pun. Why not post something bigger? > > | > | > ----+---- > | > ( > \ > / \ > / \ > / \ HAHAHA!!!! For those of you who didn't get it: Jeroen's post was the character for "small" and Wes' was the character for "big" 8-)