Whose Streets? Cops' Streets! One woman is raped and another is murdered in Brownstone Brooklyn, where female victims with the right demographic profile (white, young, middle- to upper-class) are usually front-page attractions in the tabloids. And yet two weeks go by before detectives release a description of the assailant, months before a composite sketch is drawn, and almost that long before any of the daily papers report the story. Why? The victims are lesbians, and they are women of color. While there's no firm indication that the women attacked in Boerum Hill in July were targeted for that reason, the cops' subsequent handling of the crime reeks of bias. When it comes to violence against lesbians and women of color, Brooklyn's Finest have a cynical routine that's become as familiar as it is infuriating: put the investigation on the far back burner and/or slander the survivor. In April 1994, police leaked to the press that a woman raped in Prospect Park was a lesbian, and thus her story worthy of doubt. Daily News columnist Mike McAlary swiftly called her a liar who faked the rape to promote an upcoming anti-violence rally. (He is now facing a libel lawsuit.) This summer, when the weekly community papers called up for quotes on the July murder and rape, Brooklyn North Homicide's Deputy Inspector Martin Johnson gave his unlikely take on the crime: that the dead woman was murdered either by her lover in a domestic dispute or by a third woman who has fled the state. Johnson told one paper that the lesbian community would "be very surprised and angry . . . when we get the right person"--this while the investigation was still only beginning. This indifference feeds the climate of hatred and intimidation that we'd often like to think doesn't exist in these relatively pastoral neighborhoods: Soon after Johnson's remarks were published, Park Slope's queer bookstore, A Room of Our Own, received several phone calls from men threatening "to start killing lesbians. You're going to have bodies on the stoop." Fighting these threats, and violence against women in general, has been left to anti-violence activists. Which is why many of us have been disturbed by the tone of some of the organizing. When some 200 lesbians and supporters marched through Boerum Hill and the Slope in late July, much of the chanting was merely for "safe streets" amd "more arrests"--the very rhetoric of crime victimhood that has been used to promote the police state that we now have. Equal protection under the law is a laudable goal, but that alone won't stop the violence that flourishes in other neighborhoods under the eye of (or perpetrated by) the police, nor will it do anything to break down the rape culture that cultivates these crimes in the first place. In the wake of horrific crimes such as these, it's always tempting to use whatever leverage one can to see that justice is done. But life isn't like Cops: Not everything can be solved by more aggressively hunting down perps. Ultimately, it's not more arrests we need, it's less violence against women. .