![]() |
|
"But methods of
communication, whether they are as old as roads or as new as digital
broadcasting, make where you are less definitive of what you are."
|
Nationality or Not
One thing I find amazingly compelling about the Internet is the fact that it gives us all access to the poetry and points of view of so many writers from other countries. As words zip back and forth on newsgroups, bulletin boards and mailing lists, all of us find certain people with whom we feel an enhanced form of kinship. Their ability to express themselves in writing, the nuances of their 'virtual' personalities, sense of humor (or humour, depending on what form of English you're typing in), stylistic tastes, all these things (if one is very lucky) add to and amplify one's own sense of enjoyment in being a writer in the late twentieth century. Humankind is notoriously territorial. Those whose responsibility it is to draw the lines on maps will never be out of a job, as we all strive to define what belongs to which individual, family, village, county, country or continent. It's as much to do with belonging as with ownership: geography traditionally defines allegiances. But methods of communication, whether they are as old as roads or as new as digital broadcasting, make where you are less definitive of what you are. So we invent pseudo-territories of class, fashion, occupation and so on, to reassure ourselves about where we, so to speak, stand. To put it another way, we talk to some people more than others. Culture develops amongst the members of a group; if some of the members also belong to other groups, the cultures of the groups may influence each other. This may be a Good Thing, or it may be a Bad Thing. And nastier things can happen when groups overlap in some territory or pseudo- territory. The Internet is just one more pseudo-space in which pseudo-territories can be defined. What makes the Internet particularly interesting is that the influence of real geography on the definition of such territories becomes vestigial. There are still a few markers - my email or web address may define where I'm located - but otherwise, it's down to local time affecting when I log on, and how I spell 'colour.' The broad question that motivated me to choose the theme of 'Nationality or Not' for this issue was how far and in what ways the use of a non- geographical medium influences the poetry of those who use it. I've selected poems that illuminate some aspect of this question, though not always in a straightforward way, of course. Oooh, but I'm assuming everyone speaks some variety of English, aren't I? Naughty of me. The difference it makes to those who don't (in a pseudo-space where most do) is an interesting question in itself. There's some illumination of that in this issue too. But this is a poetry magazine, not a sociology journal. The theme exists to give a shape, not to define the content. The poems are here because they're good. I'm sure you'll enjoy them. My thanks to Jennifer Ley for giving me the opportunity to guest-edit this edition of Riding the Meridian, to all the contributors, and to you, gentle reader. Peter Howard, Guest Editor for Riding the Meridian, Volume One, Number One with an introduction from Jennifer Ley
|
||