Re: storing visiblity info. in VRML (fwd)

Kevin Goldsmith (unitcirc@netcom.com)
Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:38:51 -0700 (PDT)

I'm forwarding this message from the VRML list, 'cause it's not so much
about VRML as it is about cyberspace and now that the furor is over, it's
getting quite around here.

Kevin

Forwarded message:
>
> You wrote:
> >
>
> >One of the key concepts in the book Snowcrash (admitedly fiction) was
> that of a
> >'standard' numbering scheme to implement 'unreal estate'. I can see
> 'regions'
> >being something like this, and I think that it may be a good idea.
> However, I
> >think it's more likely for all concerned to simply go their seperate
> ways.
> >Getting concensus I think will be difficult on 'real esate claims'.
> Who gets
> >0.0.0?
> >
>
> Well, in Snowcrash the protocol was developed by the ACM, and space
> was sold to companies, with the profits going to maintain the
> infrastructure. So the person with the most money gets ( 0, 0, 0 ).
>
> An extension of the current situation is much more likely. There
> will just be dozens of interconnected vegas-style "strips", with each
> one seeming to be the center of the metaverse while you're there.
>
> --Matt Setzer
> msetzer@ix.netcom.com
>
>