Mail Problems *TEST*
Steven Cockrill (@post.demon.co.uk,@sprill.demon.co.uk:vanevery@rbdc.rbdc.com)
Sun, 30 Apr 1995 04:07:18 -0700
>From !@mail4.netcom.com:owner-vworlds-list@netcom.com Sat, 29 Apr 95 21:19:27 GMT
Return-Path: <@mail4.netcom.com:owner-vworlds-list@netcom.com>
Message-Id: <m0s504U-0003OiC@rbdc.rbdc.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 95 20:07 EDT
In-reply-to: <199504281634.LAA24793@millenium.texas.net> (andyn@texas.net)
Sender: owner-vworlds-list@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vworlds-list@netcom.com
X-Status: ORL
From: Steven Cockrill <scockrill@sprill.demon.co.uk>
From: Brandon Van every <vanevery@rbdc.rbdc.com>
To: vworlds-list@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Concretizing the theorizing
Andy wrote:
Most of the limitations of convention will hopefully be a problem only for
virtual spaces with non-artistic intent. The limitations on art will only be
those of technology (as the state-of-the-art will never keep up with artists).
Well put. I think my original question arose from all the thought
I've put into 3d net games. It's clear that this has non-artistic
goals, so conventions become a problem.
Cheers,
Brandon