comp.org.eff.talk,alt.religion.scientology,netcom.netnews,misc.legal.computing,m
isc.legal
Subject: Re: Unfeasible and about Copyrights (was Re: Netcom)
Date: 7 May 1995 02:26:33 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
References:
<3oa7r3$lej@nyx10.cs.du.edu>


<3of2l6$o30@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>

In article <3of2l6$o30@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> rnewman@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ron
Newman) writes:

EFF located an attorney, Richard Horning, who would represent
Tom pro bono. (Tom subsequently switched to a new attorney that
was suggested by his insurance company.)

Got it. I was a bit harsh at Brad when he said EFF had provided Tom's
attorney. I knew his lawyer was being paid. Did the first lawyer
actually do any work, or was he replaced before taking the case?
And did he explain this, I wonder, when he was at the talk Brad
described?

Nico Garcia
raoul@mit.edu
My opinions are my own, not MIT's or my employer's or my cat's
(Well, maybe my cat's....)