Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (rumpleteazer.UCSC.EDU [128.114.129.45]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.4/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id LAA20207 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 11:28:41 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cats-po-1 (root@cats-po-1.UCSC.EDU [128.114.129.22]) by cats.ucsc.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4.cats-athena) with SMTP id KAA15481 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cats.ucsc.edu by cats-po-1 (8.6.13/4.8) id KAA23512; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:28:34 -0700 Message-ID: <3437CCA0.7390DCA3@cats.ucsc.edu> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 10:21:37 -0700 From: Christian Reply-To: harlowc@cats.ucsc.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Subject: Re: Marxian Theory: Continuing Validities References: <1.5.4.16.19971006065442.3747f83e@pop.uvm.edu> <199710061659.MAA25375@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas F Brown wrote: > >It (sic) not only creates massive dislocation, in > >addition it creates and maintains undeniable/unexcusable inequality for regions > >throughout the world. > > Capitalism also raises the economic standards of living wherever it is > implemented. I am not making this observation as a defender of capitalism. > But for every crude truism one can raise from a Marxist perspective, it > is just as easy to raise an equally crude counter-truism from a libertarian > perspective. > Wrong. Your entire point here is flawed. First off Capitalism isn't implemented like some sort of social policy. Capitalism emerged from Europ and incoroporated the entire world through violent colonialism. Do you honestly feel that this raised the standard of living in those places. If you do you have some pretty interesting indicators of "standards of living". You say that your problem with "some Marxist theory" is that it is not a powerful enough analytic tool....Well give me a more powerful one to discuss the systemic inequalities, dislocations, and violence in the world and I'll use it.... > Personally, I find both Marxism and Libertarianism to be quite powerful > theories, and I also find them both to be laughably irrelevant utopian > political programs. Liberterianism: i agree. Marxism: disagree. There is nothing inherently utopian about utilizing marxian analysis to understand your political situation. In the face of neoliberalism and poststructural analyis, I find a marxist based perspective to be one of the last relevant sociologies available for the politically aware sociologist/activist. Best, Christian