Received: from sobek.Colorado.EDU (sobek.Colorado.EDU [128.138.151.62]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id TAA28119 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 19:04:53 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from glenn@localhost) by sobek.Colorado.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.5/Unixops/Hesiod/(SDM)) id TAA15941; Tue, 6 May 1997 19:04:53 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 19:04:52 -0600 (MDT) From: "Glenn W. Muschert" To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Subject: Re: Combining lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII The list server at Texas will no longer be relevant to the list. Everything is operating out of the Colorado list server. So, for those people who already were on the Colorado list, there will be no change, except that there are more subscribers. For the people who were on the Texas list, they will now be subscribed to the Colorado list, and will do everything through the Colodao listserver. The Texas list is being combined with the Colorado list. The Texas list server will no longer operate for this list, and everything will go through the the Colorado list. The Texas list should go down soon, maybe Bob Woldman can fill us in on that. People already subscribed to the Texas list have been added to the Colorado list, and new subscribers will be instructed to subscribe to the Colorado list. Basically, we will have one list operating out of the colorado list server working out of Colorado. Glenn On Tue, 6 May 1997, Elizabeth Pullen wrote: > > Could you provide a little more information on how the combined socgrad > lists will work? Do we direct our messages to either address? When we want > to go "nomail" or unsubscribe, do we sent instructions to one or both > listservs? I have messages today coming from both addresses so I assume > one is not taking priority over the other. Explanation, please! > z > Liz Pullen > epullen@drew.edu >