Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.86]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id XAA26652 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 23:05:23 -0700 (MST) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IGQV2MZCF48WW1EY@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 01:04:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IGQV2KYUL08WVYN4@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 01:04:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <3695-5>; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 01:04:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 01:04:45 -0500 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: Help on Social Change To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Mar21.010450edt.3695-5@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I agree with the post that advised caution with operationalization of "marital tension." Michael Lucas suggests that you try "Marital Satisfaction," and this is a plausible idea. I should note, however, that there is a general consensus about the fact that marital satisfaction is not the same as "marital happiness." ======================================= I would guess that self-reported measures of marital satisfaction could be subject to Lake Woebegone effect. This is certainly true of job satisfaction.