Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19970613155256.006c0358@email.rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:52:56 -0400
To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu
From: wayne brekhus <brekhus@rci.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: ratings
In-Reply-To: <33A1688A.6557@yale.edu>
References: <199706122201.PAA07292@weber.ucsd.edu>
 <33A0ADC8.6BAD@yale.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
For this coming year (97-98) Rutgers brought in candidates from Berkeley,
UNC, and Princeton.  We made job offers to the candidates from Berkeley and
UNC, and hired the Berkeley candidate. In 95-96 we brought in candidates
from Wisconsin, Penn, and somewhere else that I can't remember (I'm sure it
was a top school however) and hired the one from Wisconsin.  In 94-95 we
brought in candidates from Wisconsin and UCSD and made an offer to the
Wisconsin candidate. We didn't get to make a hire that year, however. I
remember all three candidates interviewed in this year's job search were
not only from top departments but they had very strong publication records.

Wayne Brekhus
Rutgers University
brekhus@rci.rutgers.edu

At 11:34 AM 6/13/97 -0400, you wrote:
>FYI
>
>I've put together a spreadsheet (Excel 7.0) with the info on NRC ratings
>on one worksheet and one with a matrix for interviews and another for
>hires.  I'd be happy to record the data as people report, unless someone
>else would rather.  Just for quick and dirty first cut, I'd say we try
>to fill in interviewees for this academic year and hires for the last
>three (94-5, 95-6 and 96-7).  I put the Yale and UNC interveiws in. 
>Beth, which hires are for the last three years?  Do you know about
>interviewees?  Thoughts?
>
>The spreadsheet is available on the web at:
>
>   http://statlab.stat.yale.edu/cityroom/sociology.xls
>
>
>-- 
>Dan
>
>