Received: from mail-relay1.cis.yale.edu (mail-relay1.cis.yale.edu [130.132.21.199]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id UAA13180 for <socgrad@csf.colorado.edu>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 20:17:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from aeternitas.cis.yale.edu (root@aeternitas.cis.yale.edu [130.132.143.31])
	by mail-relay1.cis.yale.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA25835
	for <socgrad@csf.colorado.edu>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 22:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hud03.som.yale.edu (hud03.som.yale.edu [130.132.152.116])
	by aeternitas.cis.yale.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA11907
	for <socgrad@csf.colorado.edu>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 22:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <33A0ADC8.6BAD@yale.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 22:17:44 -0400
From: DJR <daniel.ryan@yale.edu>
Reply-To: daniel.ryan@yale.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu
Subject: Re: ratings
References: <199706122201.PAA07292@weber.ucsd.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
A note:  The thing we need to look at is not just where the hires came
from but also where the folks who got selected for the on-campus
interviews came from.  It may sound naive, but for a zero order
assumption, let's start with the idea that once you get an interview,
it's up to you to perform well.  Question is who gets that opportunity.

We had nine this year -- I'll verify this, but I think it was UNC, UCh,
Harvard, Columbia, UCLA (2), Princeton, and ? (2).  Can any of my
brothers and sisters in New Haven complete the list?

And Laura is right that we're tapping only the research university
market by this approach.  Perhaps in step two we can ask who got
interviews where, but that's a different can of worms.

djr