Received: from res.lse.ac.uk (res.lse.ac.uk [158.143.96.63]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id EAA05204 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 04:12:01 -0600 (MDT) From: M.AMOAH@lse.ac.uk Received: from smtplink.lse.ac.uk by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Thu, 26 Jun 1997 11:11:06 +0100 Received: from ccMail by smtplink.lse.ac.uk (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id AA867345704; Thu, 26 Jun 97 11:07:43 GMT Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 11:07:43 GMT Message-Id: <9705268673.AA867345704@smtplink.lse.ac.uk> To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Subject: Re[2]: WHY GOD NEVER RECEIVED TENURE AT ANY UNIVERSITY So what is God actually saying then? ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: WHY GOD NEVER RECEIVED TENURE AT ANY UNIVERSITY Author: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu at :external_mail Date: 6/25/97 02:01 > >WHY GOD NEVER RECEIVED TENURE AT ANY UNIVERSITY > > > >1.He had only one major publication. > >2.It was in Hebrew. > >3.It had no references. > >4.It wasn't published in a refereed journal. > >5.Some even doubt he wrote it himself. > >6.It may be true that he created the world, but what has he done since then > >? > >7.His cooperative efforts have been quite limited. > >8.The scientific community has had a hard time replicating his results. > >9.He never applied to the Ethics Board for permission to use human > >subjects. > >10.When one experiment went awry, he tried to cover it up by drowning the > >subjects. > >11.When subjects didn't behave as predicted, he deleted them from the > >sample. > >12.He rarely came to class, just told students to read the Book. >>13.Some say he had his son teach the class. > >14.He expelled his first two students for learning. > >15.Although there were only ten requirements, most students failed his > >tests. > >16.His office hours were infrequent and usually held on a mountain top. 17. He knocked up one of his students.