Received: from UConnVM.UConn.Edu (uconnvm.uconn.edu [137.99.26.3]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with SMTP id OAA04050 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:12:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU by UConnVM.UConn.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1151; Wed, 25 Jun 97 16:12:32 EDT Received: from UConnVM.UConn.Edu (NJE origin DAVIDSON@UCONNVM) by UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU (LMail V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 3582; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:12:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 97 16:08:12 EDT From: Alan Davidson Subject: tracking To: socgrad@CSF.COLORADO.EDU Message-Id: <970625.161231.EDT.DAVIDSON@UConnVM.UConn.Edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Just a quick note, I don't think ANYONE on the "tracking exists" side of the fence is implying that anything exists to such a deterministic or conspiratorial level as a regime structure or what not? I think this is more a discussion a bout the micropolitics of departments, and perhaps only specific departments. As for the issue of sociology as a science issue, I would agree -- there is nothing inherently "unscientific" about studying issues such as gender and race, it is just that folks that study issues of gender, race, gay and lesbian studies, and even religion are more likely to be accused of having their biographies impact their work than are folks who study stratification and other "more prestigious -- i.e., less slippery" areas of inquiry.