Received: from jhuml2.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml2.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.87]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id SAA14947 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 18:48:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKGQ3EBP0W96VQMP@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 20:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKGQ3DK5GG95MSKJ@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 20:48:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <2530-7>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 20:48:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 20:47:54 -0400 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: tracking To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Jun24.204804edt.2530-7@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT >> That's a reasonable criticism, but it's so general it's always true. >> The only thing it tells you about tracking is that everyone is tracked >> in everything they do. > >Precisely--with variations in substance, intensity, etc. Seems more >useful to sort out degrees, frequencies, and patterns than start with a >polemic about free will and determinism. That's a lovely goal, to make a scale of tracking pressure. It's much more ambitious than my conception. I think my simplified (oversimplified?) conception is a more practical place to start, just to see if a significant pattern emerges and to see what kind of impact it has on people according to my dichotomous conception. If we get results, then we can go on to develop a scale. However, when we're dealing with such a subjective phenomenon--how much social influence do you experience?--I think that it might be overly ambitious to think we can more than scratch the surface of that with the measurement capabilities we have. But I am not a social psychologist and so I might be underestimating what those folks are capable of.