Received: from jhuml2.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml2.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.87]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id GAA11312 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 06:13:53 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKFZPIJ53495N04O@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 08:13:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKFZP2L7BW95MSKJ@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 08:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <51-7>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 08:12:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 08:12:49 -0400 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: Areas of interest/prestige To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Jun24.081252edt.51-7@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT >Is sociology a highly respected department in your university? Well, it brings in more money than history, anthropology, politics, and english, so I would guess it has more status here than those departments. >Do your friends in English get excited about current sociologists? Why would they? Most current sociology is too specialized, parochial, and poorly written to excite anybody at all. >Is sociology widely acknowledged to be the place to go if you >want to do social theory? I don't know. What does it mean to "do" social theory? Here we do empirical research in a theoretical context. No one writes theory divorced from evidence. This would be the wrong department to come to for that. >Actually, no. This is not a matter of simple parochialism. English and >literary studies have repeatedly raided/appropriated/colonized other fields, >because they appreciate (some of) what is happening in anthropology, >psychology, political science, biology, physics, etc. Current sociology >doesn't seem to command the same respect--although, admittedly, Marx and >Weber and some others do. Are we going to judge our status by how much literary studies borrows from us? I don't see the relevance. Are we writing science or literature?