Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.86]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id TAA02252 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 19:10:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKDY9H1N6O95MWXY@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 21:09:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKDY9B37P895MSKJ@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 21:09:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <26-7>; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 21:09:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 21:09:31 -0400 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: "Stranglehold" To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Jun22.210933edt.26-7@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > Could Michael be clearer to what extent hiring women as gender >specialists breaks the stranglehold of middle-aged white males over the >future training and recruitment of sociologists, I would think it actually >makes it easier to marginalize women and scholars interested in gender >in sociology departments and perhaps in the discipline as a whole. It only works to marginalize women in gender ghettos if they are at the same time constrained from working in other specialties. If they are not constrained from working in whatever specialty they choose on account of their sex, then I don't see how you could possibly consider this sexist demand structure as marginalizing women. It simply gives them an opportunity that men aren't allowed. On the other hand, if women are constrained from entry into other specialties on account of their sex, then I would agree with your argument. But we don't have any evidence so far of such constraint.