Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.86]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id XAA22336 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 23:18:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKBECRS36896VPSL@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 01:18:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IKBECQERYG95MSKJ@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 01:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <547-1>; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 01:17:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 01:17:53 -0400 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: hiring To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Jun21.011759edt.547-1@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT >Hold on--are you suggesting that "gendered social interactions" are >uniform from one institutional setting to the next? I think her point is >in demonstrating how gender as a systematic pattern of social relations >is organized in one particular institutional setting--academic sociology. I understand what she was trying to demonstrate. My point is that she failed to demonstrate it. Any of her examples could have occured in any professional setting. None of them constitute tracking certain students into certain specialties. They're just examples of gendered interactions. And while such interactions may be different in different institutional settings, the examples she offered did not demonstrate anything unique to academic sociology. >I'm also troubled by your response to this scenario: > >> >given professor invited a male graduate student to his home to work on an >> >NSF application. Apparently, they stayed up really late crafting the >> >application carefully, etc. When one of his women advisees was applying >> >for a grant, however, time to work on her application was relegated to >> >office hours at the University. When confronted with this difference, he >> >> This guy was probably afraid of a sexual harassment rap. I can certainly see >> how this would constitute differential or even discriminatory treatment >> according to gender, but it's a function of pervasive social regulation >> rather than anything specific to the discipline. And again, I don't see how >> this constitutes a push into any particular specialty. >> >Of course, no one is accusing him of sleeping with the male graduate >student nor does the male graduate student recieve any flack for trying to >win favors by spending late hours at his professors home. Social >regulation to be sure but in forms that are highly gendered... The point is that this example doesn't demonstrate the existence of tracking certain students into certain specialties, and doesn't have anything to do with the discipline of sociology, considering that the same problem could turn up in any professional setting.