Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (rumpleteazer.UCSC.EDU [128.114.129.45]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id LAA18177 for <socgrad@csf.colorado.edu>; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 11:55:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from cats-po-1 (root@cats-po-1.UCSC.EDU [128.114.129.22])
          by cats.ucsc.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4.cats-athena) with SMTP
	  id KAA07904 for <socgrad@csf.colorado.edu>; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harlowc.ucsc.edu by cats-po-1 (8.6.13/4.8) id KAA20154; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:55:46 -0700
Message-ID: <31FE4BC3.542B@cats.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 10:52:03 -0700
From: Christian Harlow <harlowc@cats.ucsc.edu>
Reply-To: harlowc@cats.ucsc.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu
Subject: Re: Pro-Cite Vs. Endnote Plus: Upgrade Available
References: <199707300425.AAA12546@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <33DF29D0.11D5@yale.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dan Ryan wrote:
> 
> I'm an Endnote fan, but there's a problem switching to Word 97.  Endnote
> Plus 2.1 is not compatible.  Their advice?  Don't switch to Word 97 'til
> you get the new version of Endnote or a beta version patch available
> from their Website.  A little lame, but I like the product so I
> capitulate....
> 

The Upgrade for Word 97 is now available and works very well. I have not
tried to print straight out of it but i shall today and let you know how
it works.  The upgrade is titled 2.3.0.2    

its a strange set of numbers for an upgrade, but anyways.

Best,

Christian