Received: from socio.com (socionet.socio.com [206.0.230.2]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with SMTP id LAA17527 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 11:18:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: from netpc4 by socio.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA15319; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:15:40 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:15:40 -0700 From: mcarley@socionet.socio.com (Michael Carley) Message-Id: <199707301715.KAA15319@socio.com > To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Subject: Re: Pro-Cite Vs. Endnote Plus MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pardon my ignorance, but what is the purpose of the two software items being debated? I have never heard of either, and it sounds useful. mike > I'm an Endnote fan, but there's a problem switching to Word 97. Endnote > Plus 2.1 is not compatible. Their advice? Don't switch to Word 97 'til > you get the new version of Endnote or a beta version patch available > from their Website. A little lame, but I like the product so I > capitulate.... > > As for printing a bibliography, version 2.1 doesn't seem to improve on > the "select all, insert citations in blank doc, create bibliography" > approach mentioned by Thomas. > > *********************************************** Michael Carley Sociometrics Corporation 170 State St. Suite 260 Los Altos CA 94022 (415) 949-3282 ext 208 voice (415) 949-3299 FAX mcarley@socio.com ***********************************************