Message-ID: <31FD3786.6B07@cats.ucsc.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 15:13:26 -0700
From: Christian Harlow <harlowc@cats.ucsc.edu>
Reply-To: harlowc@cats.ucsc.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu
Subject: Re: Pro-Cite Vs. Endnote Plus
References: <9707292145.AA39912@saluki-mail.fiber2.siu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Chuck,

I use EndnotePlus and find it invaluable.  However I think that one of
the most important thing to factor into your decision is what kind of
"filters" you need.  For instance out here in the UC we our library
search engine is called "Melvyl" so it was imperative for me to to get a
bibliographic database builder that could interpret Melvyl's various
formats (ERIC, CURRENT CONTENTS, MAGS, etc...) This allows you to import
your library searches directly into the database, saving you precious
time and energy by not making you enter these by hand...

Hope this has helped a little bit.  The main point is to make sure that
whichever one you go with can import your library searches into your
database.

Best,

Christian