Received: from mailhub.cns.ksu.edu (grunt.ksu.ksu.edu [129.130.12.17]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id WAA25271 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 22:06:14 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cbs (dcoon@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu [129.130.12.4]) by mailhub.cns.ksu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5/mailhub+tar@ksu.edu) with SMTP id XAA01291 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:06:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by cbs (SMI-8.6/1.34) id XAA28924; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:06:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:06:10 -0500 (CDT) From: "Dave Alan Coon (:" X-Sender: dcoon@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu cc: Sociology Graduate Students -- International Subject: Re: rip-roarin' methods texts, exercises In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I just completed a graduate course in Social Research Methods, and we used the Lofland and Lofland bookk. It is clearly written in an easy to understand format. Also another book which we used that dealt with qualitative research was _Case_Study_Research_2nd ed, by Robert K. Yin, again an easy to understand book that deals with Case Study research in POarticular. The Babbie book seems to be pretty much a defacto standard for undergrad methods coueses but it gives somewhat of a cursory treatment of qualitative methods. Interestingly enough, my undergrad methods course did not use Babbie, I think the book was by Szafran and Szasfran (sp?) and it focused mainly in quantitative research. Before I started grad school it is almost as if I was under the impression that all research must be quantitative, I have since learned that this is not the case at all. I can see the value of other types of research like Femminist methods, although given my hard core science background, I still have a hard time grasping less objective femminist methods or qualitative methods, I certainly see the value of these methods, but many of them run totally contrary to the whole idea of scientific investigation in hte eyes of some, particularly those in math, physics, and statistics. Personally, I feel that at the heart of scientific investigation is the desire to gain knowledge and understanding and some things are more easily understood not by numbers and statitics but by real world observations/expierences like those in qualitative methods. Sincerely, David Coon http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~dcoon MA Student & Graduate Teaching Asst. Dept. of Sociology, Anthropology, & Social Work http://www.ksu.edu/sasw/ Kansas State University ============================================================================== Ideas that are real 'are real in their consequences' paraphrase of W.I. Thomas ==============================================================================