Received: from jhuml2.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml2.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.87]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id RAA21778 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 17:26:46 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.1-7 #18666) id <01IKYSMOSBLS91VR94@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 19:22:10 EDT Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.1-7 #18666) with SMTP id <01IKYSNAAY5A91VR9A@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Mon, 07 Jul 1997 19:15:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <412-2>; Mon, 07 Jul 1997 19:15:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 19:15:25 -0400 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: Tracking To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Jul7.191535edt.412-2@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> >Although I think most of you are sick of this topic, there are still a >couple of questions that haven't been addressed (IMOHO). If institutions >are patterns of behavior, repeated through time, why can't we argue that >gendered interactions are institutions? If we accept a more diffuse >conceptualization of tracking, isn't it possible that gendered >interactions are one mechanism through which institutionalized tracking >takes place (within sociology and elsewhere)? It also seems odd to me >that many of us were confining our questions about tracking to sociology, >specifically. Our community of sociologists exist within the context of a >wider society, and it seems likely that our patterns of behavior are >influenced by that larger context. We know that gendered tracking exists >in this wider context, so the question seems to be whether sociology is an >exception to that pattern. Stipulating all the above, do you see tracking as a social problem? If so, what would be your policy recommendations?