Received: from ucsu.Colorado.EDU (ucsu.Colorado.EDU [128.138.129.83]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id RAA13552 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:16:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (chivers@localhost) by ucsu.Colorado.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p) with SMTP id RAA03925 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:16:27 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:16:26 -0600 (MDT) From: CHIVERS JAMES FARREL To: Sociology Graduate Students -- International Subject: Re: Pro-Cite Vs. Endnote Plus In-Reply-To: <199707312252.SAA22554@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Thomas F Brown wrote: > > Macs are great; I do all my typing on one. But much software that > you might want to use won't be available for the mac, especially > the more specialized stuff. SPSS is probably available, but if not > you can get something just as good. But I don't think you'll find mac > versions of lisrel or nudist, and that could be crucial to you. Snip: I hate to disagree, but I believe you can run many more things on a mac than you might suspect. Procite, sas, spss, tons o word processing, mathematica ans it's statistical pack, ect. I would hate to see someone that wants a mac not to get one. > > I hate to contribute to killing off a system I prefer, but practically, > it's time to switch. The new windows are so much like the mac anyway > that it won't be that much of a loss. > jim c