Message-Id: <199701311945.OAA13065@sable.cc.vt.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:45:18 +0500
To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu
From: jjanosko@vt.edu (Jeff Janosko)
Subject: Re: Super-Bowl
Dear Pam (and other socgrads),
        Sorry, I got carried away. You're right...Mr. Surfer explained his 
intentions in his second post.  My self-righteousness was unwarranted and 
not conducive to sincere dialogue. However, I still think it is 
inappropriate for him/her to participate on this list under an acronym.
        My Apologies, Jeff   

On January 31, 1997, Pam Paxton wrote.:
>Jeff,
>I cannot see where your continued attacks on Joe Surfer are leading.  He 
>explained his post in an adequate manner, and, although he chooses to 
>address issues of oppression in a manner different than you, your response 
>to it seems much too forceful.  In fact, I was surprised, considering the 
>incredibly hostile tone of your original message, that he responded with 
>such good humor.  It appears that there was a misunderstanding, but 
>continuing your vengeful attacks do not get us anywhere.  I don't know 
>much about queer theory--is there a theoretical reason why you feel his 
>approach is misguided?  Let's practice some sociology!
>
>Pam Paxton
>
>***********************************************************************
>Pamela Paxton			 		'there is definitely,
>Department of Sociology			 	 definitely, definitely
>University of North Carolina 		 	 no logic to human 
>CB#3210, Hamilton Hall			  	 behavior.'
>Chapel Hill, NC  27599-3210				-Bjork
>
>email: ppaxton@gibbs.oit.unc.edu
>***********************************************************************
>
>