Received: from quackerjack.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.160.250]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id XAA13916 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:27:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from sable.cc.vt.edu (sable.cc.vt.edu [128.173.16.30]) by quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA08430 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 01:26:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from as2511-6.sl020.cns.vt.edu (as2511-6.sl020.cns.vt.edu [128.173.32.175]) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA21855 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 01:26:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199701310626.BAA21855@sable.cc.vt.edu> X-Sender: jjanosko@mail.vt.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 02:26:21 +0500 To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu From: jjanosko@vt.edu (Jeff Janosko) Subject: Re: Super-Bowl Dear Joe Surfer Vigil, I must apologize. I never realized that perpetuating tasteless stereotypes about gays was actually "deconstruction". Perhaps ascii is incapable of rendering "subtle relationships among concepts"...but when one reiterates malicious generalizations about groups of people one must be explicit about the purpose of doing so. Otherwise, the "subtle relationships" alluded to are lost. So, your name is Joe "Surfer" Vigil? This is important...because it is in anonymity that homophobia has always flourished. If you must hide behind a pen name one must question your motives for participating in this list. On January 30, 1997, "Joe Surfer" wrote: >Jeff Janosko - > >It is unfortunate that a lot of subtle relationships among concepts cannot >be effectively communicated in ascii. For your information the mailing list >I refered to is called Bad Subjects, it contains a fair percentage of >people who are/ write and assumably live queer theory. For "us / them" to >joke about sacred cows in amercian pop cultural stereotypes is a special >treat. I think it can be called deconstruction. You take away the power of >an issue when you change who is the speaker and reverse the audience. What >was once the tools of the oppressor now becomes the plaything of the >children who don't remember what they were used for in the old days. > >The Bad Subjects list is fully archived and has their own webpage and >journal. If you want pointers let me know. I'd love to introduce some >people to it. THAT list people unsubscribe from because of the high >traffic. Unlike this one where TR Young's lectures are largely the most >coherent thread and the ideas presented in each go largely uncommented >upon. C'mon, even a few flames are nice now and then, that's why the alt.* >hierarchy is the biggest concentration of Usenet traffic. > >> If folks on the list wish to discuss the Super Bowl, I think the >>game's relationship to domestic violence (which you mention) would lead to a >>more productive discussion. > >I floated it for that reason. > >> By the way, Mr. "Surfer", what is your real name? > >My surname is on the end of my email address. Just like yours, just like >most people! > >And to throw some gasoline on the fire: > >**************************************************** >"Now, I know there's some reflexively irate homosexual in the crowd >thinking "How DARE you, Miss Thing!" and what I'm saying to you is this: I >think so little of the variations in human sexuality that I refuse to treat >you like a Fabrege egg... You are part of the human collective; come, join >in our reindeer games, you too can be poked fun at." - Dennis Miller. > >