Received: from UConnVM.UConn.Edu (uconnvm.uconn.edu [137.99.26.3]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with SMTP id RAA28199 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 17:46:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU by UConnVM.UConn.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5857; Tue, 01 Apr 97 19:44:57 EST Received: from UConnVM.UConn.Edu (NJE origin DAVIDSON@UCONNVM) by UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU (LMail V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 8577; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 19:44:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 97 19:42:10 EST From: Alan Subject: Maybe not April fools To: socgrad@CSF.COLORADO.EDU Message-Id: <970401.194457.EST.DAVIDSON@UConnVM.UConn.Edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT It may have been inadvertently posted here, but it might be useful to see how pervasive "student review" and "masters review" meetings are in departments, and what role do they play. Here at the University of Connecticut, Advisory Committees are given a great deal of power, so the graduate school frowns down on non-committee members having much more than an advisory role in student evaluation (and yes, there are faculty who would love to change things).