Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.86]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id RAA04959 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 17:12:53 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IHJUW1P3I88WWG2E@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:12:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870) id <01IHJUVYD18Q8WVYN4@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for socgrad@csf.colorado.edu; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:12:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu id <2225-3>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:12:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:12:12 -0400 From: Thomas F Brown Subject: Re: Grading/Certification and Social Control To: socgrad@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <97Apr10.191226edt.2225-3@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT TR, you did a good job of explicating the dark side of testing, but it seems to me that students benefit from some feedback on their performance, some way to discover their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the course content. Written evaluations on term papers only assess part of the students' understanding of course materials, since few term papers will incorporate all of it. Testing can better assess the students' grasp of the course content in toto. And let's be realistic--testing is a great motivator. In an ideal system students are motivated by their intellectual curiosity, but in the world we work in that's just not enough in most cases. The above is not to argue with your case--I'm with you all the way. I just think you overstated it.