Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with ESMTP id OAA09489 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 14:17:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from copland.udel.edu (copland.udel.edu [128.175.13.92]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA14130 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 13:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from strauss.udel.edu (strauss.udel.edu [128.175.13.74]) by copland.udel.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA11699 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:17:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:17:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert S Gossweiler To: SOCGRAD Subject: Imputing meaning to Lurker's attitudes Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I am one of the lurking people who support both Christian *and* TR's dialogue about the issue of lecturing on a discussion group. (I guess Tim Chester missed methods class when they were talking about non-response rates and what they mean. I also find it interesting that TC wanted to go private only after he gets the last word/flame in.) Please take flames to alt.flames or go private. I've always wondered why students spend so much time sniping and back stabing each other rather than being supportive. Do we not get enough crap from faculty not to be pounding on our fellow students? Or are some of what we do is just reproducing what we learn (e.g., right of passage, lack of self confidence....)? Please forgive my overgeneralization, but I know there is a sociological question in here somewhere.... Here's an issue for discussion: Why and when do flames occur? That is, what are some sociological reasons/theory of flaming? Are some dialogues or topics more likely to flame than others? Are flames more likely to be associated with certain social arenas or communications mediums (e.g., electronic discussion groups vs discussions at professional meetings)? How does the raising of a question get turned into a personal attribute, and what does this mean for us as teachers (who sometimes want to ask abrasive questions)? Later, Bob G. PS who wants to make a bet that TC flames me next? Can we come up with a predictive theory of response? ;-) On Mon, 21 Oct 1996 Ologygrad@aol.com wrote: > Once again, I ditto Christian's comments fully. I also ditto Laura Miller's > suggestion to remove this discussion from the realm of TR and his lectures. > Timothy M. Chester, I am of the opinion that you are out of control. > > Ivy Kennelly > Robert S. Gossweiler, Email: baubb@strauss.udel.edu U.of DE, Soc.Dept., Center for Drug & Alcohol Studies