Received: from smtp2.jps.net (smtp2.jps.net [209.63.224.235]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id VAA03749 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:44:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from jps.net ([209.142.46.155]) by smtp2.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA12646 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 20:47:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <364672B3.F01965D8@jps.net> Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 20:42:27 -0800 From: Ted Toal MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ppn Subject: The Poor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim Talboy said: "My complaint, against the tide perhaps, is the insistence that "the poor," are the problem. Given that the USA economy demands consumption beyond the needs of its inhabitants, and especially the amount of waste those citizens tolerate, these arguments are particularly galling...." This would seem to have been in response to Ed Glaze: "It seems more likely to me that the biggest sacrifices will eventually be made by the rich overconsuming populace in countries like the US because they live so much further from sustainability than poor people." I'm afraid I don't understand Jim's point. Perhaps he is under the impression that overpopulationists blame the poor of the world for the overpopulation problem. But Ed pointed out that the "rich" of the world are the one's living farther from sustainability, thereby acknowledging that they are as much or more of a problem than the poor. I suggest that we try to get beyond the idea of "blame". What is happening today in the world is far bigger than any one person, group of people, nation, or group of nations. There is no need to place blame. There is only a need for understanding the big picture, and taking actions to change it.