Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.80.6.147]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.9.1a/8.9.1/ITS-5.0/csf) with ESMTP id KAA20704 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:26:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from well.com (nobody@well.com [206.15.64.10]) by smtp.well.com (8.8.6/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA05097; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nicka@localhost) by well.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA09620; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:26:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:26:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Nicholas C. Arguimbau" To: "Van Zant, Peter J" cc: PROGRESSIVE POPULATION NETWORK Subject: RE: Overconsumption vs Overpopulation? In-Reply-To: <51792E5D4B6ED011B7DB00805FBE3836040EC0BD@xch-evt-06.ca.boeing.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII How about the profit motive with 100% taxes on estates? That would give everyone a "level playing field" at birth. The problem with the profit motive is that it requires less motive for more profit if you are initially wealthy, and ultimately converts a democracy into a "one dollar, one vote" society. On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Van Zant, Peter J wrote: > > > > ---------- > > From: rc&am[SMTP:rcollins@netlink.com.au] > > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 5:31 AM > > To: PROGRESSIVE POPULATION NETWORK > > Subject: Re: Overconsumption vs Overpopulation? > > > > > > > > Ted Toal wrote: > > > > > From my studies of economics, I believe that > > > profit maximization usually provides the most efficient way to get to a > > goal. > > > > it seems to me that the only goal of profit maximisation is profit > > maximisation, > > and even then, given the effects and preconditions of such a goal, it > > regularly > > fails to attain even that goal. as for capital accumulation being an > > efficient and > > effective system for the fulfillment of needs and enjoyment (and i don't > > moralise > > about the goodness of certain 'lifestyles' over others), well... you must > > be > > kidding. > > > > angela > > > I think we have to give the profit motive its due as a way of motivating > people. It creates a lot of problems, too, like making greed the emotion of > choice for society--actually, I don't think greed is an emotion, but that's > another conversation. However, for motivating someone to work hard over a > period of time, financial gain works pretty well. It's better than forcing > him/her to work. Idealistic notions, like doing the work for the betterment > of humanity, unfortunately lose their potency pretty fast. > >