Received: from oregon.uoregon.edu (oregon.uoregon.edu [128.223.32.18]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id NAA26206 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:47:04 -0700 (MST) Received: from DWOVMCNF.uoregon.edu (d111-206.uoregon.edu) by OREGON.UOREGON.EDU (PMDF V5.1-12 #26538) with SMTP id <01J434QNN9O48WWM7W@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU> for ppn@csf.colorado.edu; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:46:59 PST Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:46:59 -0800 (PST) From: John Bellamy Foster Subject: Re: overpopulation & Malthus X-Sender: Jfoster@oregon.uoregon.edu (Unverified) To: ppn@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <1.5.4.16.19981112125620.38873e02@oregon.uoregon.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Doug, The passage you mention on "building houses near polluted bodies of water" etc., although I doubt that it is to be found on the internet, is from Book IV, Chapter V of the Second Essay. This quote is usually taken out of context and is not as reprehensible as it is usually thought to be, and not anywhere as reprehensible as some of Malthus' other, more provocative statements that produced a storm of criticism in his day. The logic of the passage to which you refer was as follows: if you decide to promote early marriages, and still want to avoid what everyone agrees is the worst of all tragedies (i.e. famine), you should--if you are to be logical (given the fact that population must always stay in equilibrium with food supply) "court the return of the plague," etc. (A key presumption of Malthus' analysis was that moral restraint was not generally possible for the poor, but only for the rich.) This hardly compares to Malthus' other more reprehensible statements such as his contention that infants are of comparatively little value to society (in the context of whether relief should be provided to prevent them from dying of starvation); his claim that the poor had no right to relief; that the poor were not invited to the "mighty feast" of the well to do; that the peasants should be "swept" from the land, etc. By the way, members of this list who are interested in Malthus may pleased to know that the December issue of ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT includes a Bicentennial symposium on Malthus with an extensive introduction to Malthus' population theory by me followed by articles by William Catton, Herman Daly, Tom Athanasiou, Richard Wiltgen, Eric Ross and Martha Gimenez. The same issue also includes articles by David Korten, Edward Herman, Kari Norgaard, Susan Roschke, Peter Grahame and others. Those not familiar with ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT can check out its Web site: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journals/usdetails/j0151.html List members may be further interested to know that I have written a major article on "Malthus' Essay on Population After 200 Years: A Marxian View" which will appear in the December 1998 issue of MONTHLY REVIEW. John Bellamy Foster At 10:05 AM 11/11/98 -0500, you wrote: >Ed Glaze III wrote: > >>I though that Angela and I could carry on out little debate >>off the list but I guess I was mistaken. >> >>The basis of her recent Malthus message was evidently >>to counter the links I gave her for publications that had >>special issues on Malthus. Here are a few URLs for >>online information. The other links are shown in my >>message to Angela below. > >Do any of these links contain the bit where Malthus recommended building >houses for the poor near polluted bodies of water, so they die earlier? I >believe this has been suppressed in subsequent editions of his masterpiece. > >Doug > > > >