Received: from mail.europa.com (exim@atheria.europa.com [199.2.194.10]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8/ITS-4.2/csf) with ESMTP id PAA04317 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:20:00 -0700 (MST) Received: from dialup-b018.europa.com ([204.202.55.18]) by mail.europa.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #5) id 0zkFC8-0007Il-00 for ppn@csf.colorado.edu; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 14:19:57 -0800 X-Sender: les@mail.vhemt.org Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 14:19:22 -0800 To: PROGRESSIVE POPULATION NETWORK From: "Les U. Knight" Subject: Re: One Child, Two, None? Christopher, I would love to see projections for an average birth rate of one. None I've seen are that optimistic. Maybe demographers feel that there isn't much point in creating projections which are so unlikely. China has yet to achieve zero population growth, even with their restrictions, due to momentum. The projection will have to take into consideration that one third of Asia's and Latin America's people are under the age of 15, as are half of Africa's. A projection of global population trends if total infertility were achieved would also be fun to see. This might seem simple: just divide six billion by the number of people who die each year and we'll have the number of years until Homo sapiens is extinct. However, death rates would drop dramatically if no more of us were born, and would continue to decline as we re-prioritized health care. So, I hope your efforts to find unrealistically optimistic projections are more successful than mine. I look forward to seeing them posted if you find them. Les U. Knight