Received: from popact.org (popact.org [205.197.158.2]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.4/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id LAA06480 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 11:17:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cincotta.popact.org (dyna181.popact.org [205.197.158.181]) by popact.org (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA26376 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 13:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980605131920.0070d9f0@popact.org> X-Sender: cincotta@popact.org Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 13:19:21 -0500 To: ppn@csf.colorado.edu From: Richard Cincotta Subject: Re: Class and Mortality Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Martha (& PPN list): Speaking of the JAMA article, there was also an excellent article in Scientific American a few years back by Amartya Sen that featured similar (though less statistically-derived) conclusions. The article is entitled: "The Economics of Life and Death" (A. Sen, May 1993, Scientific American) (If I remember right) Sen proposed that international organizations evaluate quality of life by looking at current survivorship curves. It was a great article, and very revealing -- He compared male and female survivorship in Kerala, India with trends in African Americans. (African Americans came up short).