Received: from splava.cc.plattsburgh.edu (splava.cc.plattsburgh.edu [137.142.18.1]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.4/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id FAA08115 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 05:31:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from SPLAVA.CC.PLATTSBURGH.EDU by SPLAVA.CC.PLATTSBURGH.EDU (PMDF V5.0-8 #11626) id <01IXWORQXWXY001BQ4@SPLAVA.CC.PLATTSBURGH.EDU> for ppn@csf.colorado.edu; Sat, 06 Jun 1998 07:31:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 07:31:27 -0500 (EST) From: GLORIA BOBBIE Subject: economic globalization - a hot topic To: ppn@csf.colorado.edu Message-id: <01IXWORQXXW8001BQ4@SPLAVA.CC.PLATTSBURGH.EDU> X-VMS-To: IN%"ppn@csf.colorado.edu" MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Date sent: 6-JUN-1998 07:14:09 > Hi Nan and all, From: IN%"Nan.Hildreth@Mcione.com" 6-JUN-1998 04:27:49.46 >To: IN%"ppn@csf.colorado.edu" "PROGRESSIVE POPULATION NETWORK" >CC: >Subj: Economic globalization - a hot topic > >Dear Martha, > >Thanks for the book list. > >Economic globalization is a hot topic. Both Republican populist Pat >Buchanan and liberal Noam Chomsky say that we are becoming a Third World >country too! I explained MAI to a couple of Libertarian activists here. >They were against it. My Sierra Club has been doing action alerts on it. >Grassroots are very interested. > >We must teach a new vision besides the invisible hand. Besides Keynes' >"fair is foul and foul is fair". Some way to take care of ourselves >besides hoarding money and power. Or we will consume the world in short >sighted self-interest. > >Can anyone put it in words for me? I am an anthropologist (cultural/development) and will try to give a very brief summary of what our research has shown. > >Nan Hildreth Nan.Hildreth@MciOne.com > >"Between 1972 and 1994, real wages of working Americans fell 19 percent, >the longest slide in three centuries." (Patrick Buchanan, The Great >Betrayal: How American Sovereignty and Social Justice Are Being Sacrificed >to the Gods of the Global Economy, 1998, p 9) > >"... businesses, factories shutting down, workers being laid off, ... The >price of free trade is painful, real, lasting - where is the benefit ....? >As I began to write skeptically of free trade, I discovered that I was >trampling on holy ground. For some conservatives, to question free-trade >dogma is heresy punishable by excommunication." (ibid, page 18) In the business world profit is king....business students have the words "maximize profit" pounded into their heads. In capitalism there are three components which must work together smoothly for it to succeed as an economic ideology, the capitalist, the consumer and the laborer (everyone is a mixture of all three, but their is dominance which dictates the primary function). Keeping the above in mind, think of how business has progressed. Modern international business has its roots in colonialism and unfortunately has not gotten past the colonial mentality. We as a nation have forged into third world countries, not to develop them, but to extract profit from them. We pay the people in those countries sweatshop wages which does not actually increase their standard of living, justifying it with the reasoning that it is more than they had before. We are producing more goods, but are not creating markets in these countries, because the wages we pay, do not allow the producers of the goods to purchase them. On the homefront: It takes money to expand. The capitalist has little control over the price of materials as a rule, must satisfy the investor by showing a return or they will take their investments elsewhere so the only place to make cuts ends up being the laborers wage and benefits. We are all too familiar with the downsizing, layoffs, elimination of benefits, etc. which have occurred. However, the problem with this is, that it destroys markets at home as well and eventually too much is being produced and factories must close because they cannot sell t heir goods. Example: Nike....has a plant in anywhere USA...decides to move to Thailand where labor is cheap...closes the plant in USA laying off 1000 workers who can no longer purchase Nike shoes....moves to Thailand and pays slave wages so no market is created there.....what has happened is there are 1000 less people to purchase the shoes...multiply this by several plants and there is a surplus which cannot be sold...surpluses drive prices down and the company must downsize or close. It does not have to be this way, but until the mentality of the corporate world is change (perhaps by force via forms of worker rebellion like strikes, boycotts, etc) it will continue. There is proof that the current beliefs are false and that it does not have to be this way. If you think back to the attempts to get the minimum wage raised a few years ago, you will remember dire predictions of gloom and doom. Just the opposite happened. People had more money to spend and put into circulation in the economy, unemployment dropped rather than increasing as expected and GNP raised as was not expected. The sync between capitalist, laborer and consumer is off balance and must be righted if we are to reverse what is happening. This is a very abbreviated version but hopefully will help. Gloria