>From DUDLEY@TAMVM1.TAMU.EDU Wed Jun 29 17:35:32 1994 Return-Path: DUDLEY@TAMVM1.TAMU.EDU Received: from vaxf.Colorado.EDU (vaxf.Colorado.EDU [128.138.129.9]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9/CNS-3.5) with SMTP id RAA20889 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 1994 17:35:32 -0600 Received: from TAMVM1.TAMU.EDU (MAILER@TAMVM1) by VAXF.COLORADO.EDU (PMDF V4.2-12 #5062) id <01HE4F8QPLZ40000W2@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU>; Wed, 29 Jun 1994 17:30:38 MDT Received: from tamvm1.tamu.edu (NJE origin DUDLEY@TAMVM1) by TAMVM1.TAMU.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7760; Wed, 29 Jun 1994 15:32:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1994 15:27:49 -0500 (CDT) From: DUDLEY@TAMVM1.TAMU.EDU To: ppn@CSF.COLORADO.EDU Message-id: <01HE4F8QPVMA0000W2@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU> X-Envelope-to: ppn@CSF.COLORADO.EDU Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I too did not receive the messages from Ike Eberstein and the other couple of exchanges on the PPN that were referenced in this morning's memo. To send mes- sages to all subscribers, the sender needs to use the TO: address listed above. ...Thank you. ..... Dudley Poston, Texas A&M University