Received: from mhs.swan.ac.uk (mhs.swan.ac.uk [137.44.1.33]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id HAA09141 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 07:54:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from shs.swan.ac.uk by mhs with SMTP-LOCAL (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:54:28 +0000 Received: by shs.swan.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id <492M63Z8>; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:51:38 -0000 Message-ID: <51DA2947F405D2119ED700104B4AE51608FF4D@shs.swan.ac.uk> From: "Hughes, David" To: MedSoc@csf.colorado.edu Subject: RE: Impact of the Medical Record Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:51:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Another reference on medical records is Sally Macintyre's (1978) paper 'Some notes on record taking and making in an antenatal clinic' Sociological Review 26(3): 595-611. I wonder if anyone can help with a related enquiry? I am trying to get a sense of whether there is any literature on problems of research access to organizational documents, including records, files and other papers. My own empirical interest concerns access to National Health Service Contracts, which in theory are public documents but (perhaps for good organizational reasons) prove to be difficult to obtain in complete form. Does anybody know of any general literature (I'm already familiar with Wheeler, Scott, Plummer) on documents and research access, or of empirical studies that may be relevant?