Received: from notesmta.dcf.state.fl.us ([204.194.36.150]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3/CNS-4.0p) with SMTP id IAA19666 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 08:07:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Annette_Schwabe@dcf.state.fl.us Received: by notesmta.dcf.state.fl.us(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.05 (274.9 11-27-1996)) id 8525648E.004DDA83 ; Mon, 5 May 1997 10:10:22 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: INTERNET-MAIL To: MedSoc@csf.colorado.edu, Phil_Brown@brown.edu Message-ID: <8525648E.004DD7DE.00@notesmta.dcf.state.fl.us> Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 09:55:29 -0400 Subject: Re: research help for Canadian colleague Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I second the idea of asking providers about their patient mix in terms of payer type and proportion "indigent" and uninsured. These providers should have, via the hospital or local governmental health agency, relatively easy access to a breakdown of recipient/patient mix. I am not sure that asking providers to get those data would enhance your return rate, but you could put in a comment such as "based on your hospital's reporting data or your best estimate." Also, you ,as the surveyors, could get the data from local governmental reporting agencies by provider. For example, the Agency for Health Care Administration in the state of Florida might have data like that for the entire state, and there are likely corresponding instituitions in each of the other states. Best of luck. Annette Schwabe annette_schwabe@dcf.state.fl.us ______________________________ Reply Separator ____________________________ _____ Subject: research help for Canadian colleague Author: Phil_Brown@brown.edu at INTERNET-MAIL Date: 5/2/1997 7:41 PM A Canadian colleague has a request for help with a reserach questionnaire. I am forwarding his request to MEDSOC in the hopes that some people may have some ideas for him. Reply directly -to him- not to the whole list. His email address is at the end. -Phil ------------ I'm a Canadian sociologist working in a clinical epidemiology unit. We are about to survey amercian and canadian emergency physicians about their attitudes toward radiographic clinical decision rules. The use of these rules have been shown in prospective implementation studies to reduce the the ordering of xrays without missing fractures. I believe that for the American emergency physicians, there may be considerable economic incesntive to use the rules in managemed care institutions to save money and disincentive to use the rule in insitutions generating profit from the ordering xrays. Unfortunately none of us know enough about he US health system to know what we want to ask respondents. This is the question we have come up with, does the question seem reasonable and are the response categories appropriate? In what type of hosptial do you practice Emergency mediicine? private for profit private not for profit managed care owned (eg HMO) municipla (city or county) private not for profit public academic medical center private academic medical center federal Governement (eg military, VA) other__________________ Some of my colleagues have suggested asking the respodnet to estimate the % of emergency department patients insured by: public/federal payer, state payer, managed care, private insurance, unisured Is this a better approach? Would respodents know this? Should we ask if the respondent is salaried or fee for service? Any thoughts you might have or suggestions about who I should contact who might be helpful are greatly appreciated. ian graham Clincial Epidemiology Unit Ottawa Civic Hosptia ph:613-798-5555 x8273 fax:613-761-5492l igraham@civich.ottawa.on.ca Phil Brown, Ph.D. Professor of Sociology Brown University Box 1916 Providence RI 02912 (401) 863-2633 (secretary 863-2367) fax (401) 863-3213