Received: from bebop.chass.utoronto.ca (bebop.chass.utoronto.ca [128.100.160.4]) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.4/8.8.4/CNS-4.1p-nh) with ESMTP id OAA07463 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 14:31:09 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (magee@localhost) by bebop.chass.utoronto.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA24943 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:31:08 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: bebop.chass.utoronto.ca: magee owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:31:04 -0500 (EST) From: William Magee To: MedSoc@csf.colorado.edu Subject: modernization & medicine: need help on concept Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hi, I assigned Eugene Gallaghers' (1993) paper in Conrad & Gallagher _Health & Health Care in Developing Countries_ to my class, and am confused about how to explain the following paradox to my students (tomorrow). Any advice? My reading of Gallaghers' interpretation of Peter Bergers' take on modernization is that modernity results in (or maybe even is defined by) individuals concieving themselves as having "an inner biological uniqueness", as well as personal and moral uniqueness (p. 288). On the other hand, modern health care tranforms the patient from "a socially endowed and and identified person into a socially neutral, clinical case" (p 290). Does anyone know how this paradox is handeled in modernization theory? -- or should I take this to be a sign of the weakness of the theory (perhaps indicative of broader problems with the Functionalism from which the theory is derived)? Thanks, Bill Magee Univ. of Toronto