****************************************************************** People's Tribune (Online Edition) Vol. 25 No. 7/ July, 1998 P.O. Box 3524, Chicago, IL 60654 http://www.mcs.com/~league ****************************************************************** +----------------------------------------------------------------+ The PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.mcs.com/~league +----------------------------------------------------------------+ PAGE 1: ECONOMIC CRISIS SWEEPS THE GLOBE RISING POVERTY IGNITES FIGHT FOR A NEW SOCIETY Living in this world is becoming one big roller coaster ride, and it looks like the ride is getting rougher. The uprisings in Indonesia are just the latest indication of how deep the Asian economic crisis is. Japan's economy is in the toilet. Russia seems poised on the verge of economic collapse, and the crisis there will inevitably pull in Poland and Germany, threatening the whole of Europe. You can bet the United States isn't far behind. We are already seeing a renewed wave of downsizing and layoffs in this country, whether it be the result of mergers and acquisitions or fallout from the Asian troubles. How quickly all this will develop, no one can say for sure, but one thing is clear: A deep, serious economic crisis is sweeping the earth. The crisis is rooted in the fact that a growing mass of humanity is being plunged into absolute poverty while a relative handful of people is accumulating absolute wealth. The good news is, there is something we can do about it. We, the people, are basically faced with a choice: We can endure a society, now developing, in the form of a police state that enforces our suffering and upholds repression, or we can move forward to a new, cooperative society that cherishes and nourishes the lives of everyone. Millions of people are beginning to fight out this choice, both in this country and across the world. In the U.S., the Economic Human Rights Campaign (which also has an international dimension) is one example of the fight to rally people around our right to thrive. Sponsored by the National Welfare Rights Union, and spearheaded by the Kensington Welfare Rights Union, the Economic Human Rights Campaign '98 is a national effort to highlight the economic human rights abuses in this country caused by welfare reform and poverty. During June, the campaign's New Freedom Bus -- Freedom from Unemployment, Hunger and Homelessness -- has been traveling around the country, collecting documentation of these abuses and spotlighting the efforts of poor communities to survive and fight back. The documentation was to be presented to the United Nations at an international economic human rights tribunal in New York on July 1. The success of the struggle ultimately depends on a very broad consciousness, among the people, of their class and political interests. Today, the most revolutionary act we can commit is to show people that the source of the crisis is an economic system that values private profit above human life, and that the solution is a new system that guarantees that every person's needs are met. The developing world crisis and the people's growing struggle set the stage for the world to be transformed. To complete that transformation, revolutionaries must carry the vision of a new society all over our country through every possible means. +----------------------------------------------------------------+ INDEX to the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE (Online Edition) Vol. 25 No. 7/ July, 1998 Editorial 1. IF THIS WEALTH WAS SHARED ... News and Features 2. JULY 4, 1998: YOU'RE NOT A CAPITALIST ... WHY SUPPORT THEIR SYSTEM? 3. EYEWITNESS REPORT: INDONESIA RISES UP 4. REMEMBERING A HISTORY-MAKING MOVEMENT 30 YEARS LATER DRUM: THE BEAT GOES ON AND ON 5. A RIGHT TO A JOB - BY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 6. NEW FREEDOM BUS CROSSES AMERICA, GATHERING TESTIMONY, DISPENSING HOPE 7. MISERY GROWS IN CALIFORNIA 8. WHY CALIFORNIANS DEFEATED PROPOSITION 226 9. OUR ADVICE: DON'T BE POOR IN MISSOURI AND KANSAS 10. A VISION FOR OUR CITIES 11. STRIKE! UAW WORKERS WALK THE WALK Women and Revolution: Visions for a New America 12. 'THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL MY SON' American Lockdown 13. INVOKING THE SPIRIT OF MERLE AFRICA: ONA MOVE! >From the League 14. SIMUEL RAMEY SETS AN EXAMPLE 15. SPEAKERS FOR A NEW AMERICA; NEW BOOKLET ON TAPE [To subscribe to the online edition, send a message to pt- dist@noc.org with "Subscribe" in the subject line.] ****************************************************************** We encourage reproduction and use of all articles except those copyrighted. Please credit the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE. The PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE depends on donations from its readers -- your generosity is appreciated. For free electronic subscription, send a message to pt-dist@noc.org with "Subscribe" in the subject line. For electronic subscription problems, e-mail pt-admin@noc.org. ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** 1. EDITORIAL: IF THIS WEALTH WAS SHARED ... Day in and day out, we hear about the booming economy, low unemployment, low inflation, and so on. Yes, there's a crisis in Asia and things are bad in other parts of the world, too, but, here in the United States, everything is just peachy -- at least on Wall Street. In the rest of America, a few random examples hint that things are not so cheerful. The country is going through a new wave of mega-mergers and downsizing, with thousands of jobs being eliminated. Motorola announced on June 4 that it will eliminate 15,000 jobs. The "still-employed" are working longer hours than they did 20 years ago -- 47.1 hours a week today, compared to 43.6 hours a week in 1977. A study on job-related stress involving 3,000 employees revealed that nine out of 10 workers surveyed said they often or sometimes don't have enough time for their families or other important people in their lives. Another study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that poverty kills. Those who made less than $10,000 a year had a death rate of 2.77 to 3.22 times that of people with annual incomes of $30,000 or more. Americans who made between $10,000 and $29,000 died at a rate of 2.14 to 2.34 times higher than those in the $30,000-plus bracket. A new wave of homelessness is looming this year as Congress debates cutting back on the Department of Housing and Urban Development's rental assistance program to the tune of $2.2 billion, a cut which could put a million more people on the streets after this October. The average annual income of the families helped by the subsidy program is $7,500. These are just a very few of the many straws in the wind of change blowing through our land. A wind coming from the social tempest created by the dramatic change in the way the things we need are produced in this society. For the first time ever, new technologies enable the production of absolute abundance. For example, food can be grown overnight; homes can be built in a few hours. This is what's happening now, but the trouble is, it is not being shared. A tiny section of society -- the ones who are making the most money on Wall Street, at our expense -- owns and controls both the technology and the wealth it produces. A solution is not possible under the present system called capitalism, because it puts the interests of that tiny class and its form of private property first, and the needs of everyone else at the very last. Thus, the system itself must be replaced with a cooperative one that guarantees a public, universal owning of the wealth produced by humanity. A cooperative system ends the private privileges of the wealthy few and forever ends the separation of humanity into classes. If this new kind of wealth was shared, poverty would be eliminated. If this wealth was shared, all of us would have secure, meaningful work that wouldn't stress us out or rob us of time for our families and friends. If this wealth was shared, all of us would have a decent home to live in and no one would go hungry. All of us could live in an environment that sustains our health instead of one that kills us. All of us would have equal access to all the medical care we need. At present, the rich already have this for themselves. They are able to have it because they control the wealth and possess the power to shut the rest of us out. That is wrong. Such an evil cries out for a program to right that wrong, one that puts the needs of all of us -- including those at the bottom -- first and foremost. ****************************************************************** 2. JULY 4, 1998: YOU'RE NOT A CAPITALIST ... WHY SUPPORT THEIR SYSTEM? By Nelson Peery On July 4, we celebrate our country's 222nd birthday. While we celebrate, we often fail to ask ourselves, "Why did we separate ourselves from feudal England?" The answer that "we wanted to be independent" begs the next question: "Why did we want to be independent?" We wanted to separate ourselves from feudal England because we were not feudalists and were not part of their system. That thinking is very applicable for this Fourth of July, 1998. We again need to ask ourselves, "We are not capitalists, why should we support their system?" Over the course of some 200 years, there were reasons that the workers supported the capitalist system. As the United States economically and politically conquered most of the world, the ruling class gave part of the plunder to the American people as a bribe for their political and military support. The workers in a good portion of the world did not believe that there was any poverty in the United States, and everyone was a capitalist. At the end of World War II, this ruling class embarked on its greatest effort -- the destruction of the socialist sector of the world. They needed more support than ever from the masses. To achieve this support, they increased the bribe and millions of workers began to purchase houses and automobiles. The workers understandably felt they had an economic stake in the system. That was not enough. The ruling class knew they also had to have the hearts and minds of the people. Every sort of lie, slander, distortion of history, appeal to racism and to nationalism, smothered the political and social consciousness of the people. Murder, frame ups, blacklisting and ostracism faced those who would not submit. Thought control almost took over our country. Only approved books could be read, certain subjects could not be discussed, and opposition was equated with treason. The democratic practice of lively political discussion among workers was lost. As young generations matured, they accepted what they inherited and few even thought to question the system. Times are rapidly changing. With globalization and automation, the ruling class no longer needs to bribe the workers for their support. If the American workers won't work for "competitive" wages, starving workers from other countries will. General Motors' brutal, callous attempt to force their workers to accept cuts in wages and standards of living is just the latest example. Yet, under the terrible circumstances of hunger, homelessness, lack of medical care, or lockouts, few workers raise the question of the system. They have been trained to blame individuals or political parties. They will never blame the system unless they are challenged to do so. Herein lies the importance of the Fourth of July. Just as the people of the 1770s had to be challenged -- "What the heck do we need a king for? We're not part of that system" -- so today we have to challenge the workers, employed and unemployed. "You're not a capitalist. Why support their system?" +----------------------------------------------------------------+ DID YOU KNOW THAT ... According to a survey released in early June, Americans among the richest 1 percent are already looking forward to the most fabulous retirement ever known by a leisure class. These superrich are taking the gains they have already made in the 1990s and pouring most or all of it back into U.S. stocks, where they expect to reap even more profits. They expect to gain 15 percent a year over the next three years and 12 percent a year over the next decade. In addition to investing more in stocks, they are also saving more of their income. After-tax savings for the richest 1 percent has gone up from 19 percent in 1993 to almost 25 percent today. Amazingly, the average saving rate for the other 99 percent of Americans has fallen from 6.2 percent in 1992 to 3.8 percent today. The researchers said that these investments and savings are earmarked for respondent's "retirement." Considering that many of the superrich don't really work for a living and already have everything they need, one could wonder what it is they're saving for and retiring from. +----------------------------------------------------------------+ JOIN WITH OTHERS TO MAKE THE VISION OF A WORLD OF PLENTY A REALITY Who is the League of Revolutionaries for a New America? We are people from all walks of life who refuse to accept that there should be great suffering in a world of great abundance. Together, we can inspire people with a vision of a cooperative world where the full potential of each person can contribute to the good of all. Together, we can get our message of hope out on radio and television, in places of worship, union halls, and in the streets. We don't have all the answers, but we are confident that together we can free the minds of the millions of people who can liberate humanity. Join us! ____ I want to join the League of Revolutionaries for a New America. ____ Send me a bundle of 5__10__25__50___100___ People's Tribunes to get out in my city. ____ Send me a membership kit so I can build a chapter of the League of Revolutionaries for a New America in my city. ____ I want a speaker in my city. Send me a "Speakers for a New America" brochure. ____ I want to make a financial donation to the League of Revolutionaries for a New America. Name Address City/State/Zip Phone E-mail ****************************************************************** 3. EYEWITNESS REPORT: INDONESIA RISES UP By Curly Cohen Flying out of Jakarta on May 14, the plane dipped and turned north. Billowing smoke rose from the numerous fires set. More evident than the fires was the rage. Everywhere and everyone has been holding this rage for far too long. It had to be released. The constant and daily demonstrations by university students were the drum call, the mantra, the chant, as steady as the hum of the scooters 18 to 20 hours a day on the streets. Sometimes four to a scooter, sometimes five, everyone trying to eke out a living in a bankrupt economy. There is no public aid to fall back on. Twenty-four hour street convenience stores offer lifesavers, gum, cigarettes, water and pop. And the people -- a group of five or six with sleeping mats next to their wares, lay underneath the protection of highly worn colonial buildings left over by the Dutch. "Ah Salaam Allekhim" was the greeting, and it was met with a weary and wonderful smile. Next, the trading or giving of cigarettes as a friendly gesture. And when it became clear that you were from America -- home of Chicago, Mohammed Ali, Michael Jordan -- the smiles got deeper and warmer. Their demand was simple: "We need your help. We look to you and your country." Always with "please" attached to it. Later, radio reports stunned me when a British reporter explained how polite the looters were. I was stunned not by the politeness, but by the voice of the reporter who was obviously moved by the people's behavior. This wasn't Western rage; this was Indonesian rage that was polite and patient. Thirty years of patience with a government that produced about the third richest family in the world. Suharto, the king. But those that have toiled -- and I mean toiled -- now were receiving one more cut. The people have been so patient, while every place on their body was cut. The last cut was too much. The gas price at the pump doubled. Electricity rates rose by 75 percent. The following day, all prices were up. I had arrived 21 days earlier and on my first day had already and easily found the resistance movement at the hotel I was staying in. We shot some pool together. Joko, a university student, is handsome and tanned except for two recent bruises inflicted by the police on his face and collarbone. He was incredibly patient with my lack of Indonesian. Using English, it took him two to three times longer to communicate. The following morning, we walked to the docks at 6 a.m. On the way there, it was clear that it was a different world, just five minutes by foot from the safety of a mostly empty hotel. We had descended into the 'hood, the barrio of a different circumstance. At 6 a.m., life had not yet come to the streets. In another hour, the chaos is at your heart, but it works and there's always room, even for a weird Western traveler. The docks are huge, with ship after ship after ship. Fifteen with lumber, one with rice, fifteen more with lumber, one more with rice. The vessels were thirty to forty yards long. A lumber plank ten inches by six inches ran from the ship to the dock. It was very steep. The grade was maybe thirty degrees -- dangerous, with nothing there to catch your fall. What a choice: deeply polluted water or the hard concrete. OSHA would have a field day. But no one slipped, that I saw. They couldn't afford to, and there was no insurance to boot. More important, there were plenty to take their place. And all for a dollar fifty a day. From 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., six days a week. The men I interviewed ranged in age from 15 to 43. All were new to Jakarta, arriving within the last ten years from Sumatra, Surabaya, Flores, Celebes and Timor. No longer could they stay at their family's plot of land that had fed their previous generations for a thousand years. Now, they were forced to migrate to the city. I didn't ask, but I don't think any of the men weighed more than 100 pounds, either barefoot or in thongs. Everyone wore a hat, and under the hat a T-shirt falling down to their shoulders to catch the sweat. One salty bead dripping into the eye is too dangerous and not worth losing a job over. That T-shirt also protects their back from the relentless sun of a land that sits only six degrees below the equator. Most wear long-sleeved shirts to protect them from becoming black. With foam encased in plastic supermarket bags taped down to use as shoulder pads, they were carrying four to six pieces of lumber -- sometimes bundled, sometimes not -- 16 to 20 feet long. I suspect the lumber they were carrying weighed more than they did. After work, they took a water taxi that holds eight to ten people to the end of the dock, to their houses without plumbing. Children balanced themselves at the edge of the dock, then peed and pooped right in the water. In this barrio, there were few children that went to school. The ones that went were in uniform, and most of the children I saw were without one. It was here that the rage was boiling. It was here that you could see three luxury apartment buildings looking like the land of Oz off in the distance. It was here where these workers had, through their sweat, earned their right to sit at a just -- economically just -- table of democracy. ****************************************************************** 4. REMEMBERING A HISTORY-MAKING MOVEMENT 30 YEARS LATER DRUM: THE BEAT GOES ON AND ON By General Baker Thirty years ago, in 1968, the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement (DRUM) was founded at Chrysler's Hamtramck Assembly Plant near Detroit. It was the first of the RUM groups that later became part of the core of the League of Revolutionary Black Workers. The Hamtramck Assembly Plant was the home of the Dodge cars, where Chargers and Hemis rolled off the line at a clip of 72 cars per hour. DRUM was born out of the dire need to address the conditions of factory life at the point of production. The strike on July 12, 1968 began a groundswell and became a rallying point for black workers everywhere! The group was formed during a wildcat strike at the Dodge Main Plant in May, 1968 and led its first strike on the same plant on July 12, idling 10,000 workers for 5 days. The strike itself caught both the United Auto Workers (UAW) and Chrysler off guard; neither was prepared to deal with the upheaval. Thus, Chrysler labeled the strike extralegal instead of illegal and no discharges were sustained. Both Chrysler and the UAW frantically called out to find some new minority representatives within their ranks, in place of the old leadership types, to deal with the new conditions. The DRUM strike took place because there was no other way, at the time, to address the effects of discrimination in the workplace. There was no possible Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit to demand economic redress, no television or other media exposure to popularize our plight; just tit-for-tat struggle at the gates and the factory floor. Things have changed since then. There are many lessons learned from the DRUM struggles. First and foremost, that event changed both the UAW and Chrysler. They claimed they stood for equality, but nothing could be further from the truth. The Fair Employment Practice Commission which was hailed as a path or solution to racial discrimination, was incompetent and ineffective and thus did nothing. Not a single representative tied to the bureaucratic structure of the corporations or the union lifted a finger. Because DRUM was not tied to either of them, and stood independent of both, it was able to strike out in both directions in the battle for equality. But the DRUM road was pursued in a period when the speculative wing of capital was still in its infancy, at a time when the financial and industrial wing of capital held hegemony. Thus, the large and stable plants were still like stable fixtures. The wholesale development of plant closings was not yet predominant, thus rendering the point of production central to organizing large concentrations of unskilled and semiskilled workers. It took place when the body shops and paint shops inside of the large auto plants had real concentrations of black and other minority workers, before they were replaced by robots. It coincided with the period of time when trade unions were still growing and not in decline. It took place before Honda, Toyota, Mercedes, BMW, etc., arrived on U.S. soil. It took place when mergers were almost unheard of and the U.S. auto industry was exclusively the "big four" of Chrysler, General Motors, Ford and American Motors. Today, semiskilled and unskilled, unemployed as well as employed workers, are all thrown into battle for the few remaining high- paid jobs, wherever they may surface. And, once again, black workers find themselves striking blows from the bottom as new barriers and tests of all kinds block access to entry-level and apprentice jobs. Today, on the 30th anniversary of DRUM, the battle is for economic survival. The fight to maintain our standard of living takes center stage, and such a struggle demands the mobilization of all who are affected on all fronts. ****************************************************************** 5. A RIGHT TO A JOB - BY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT By Adolph Reed Editor's note: In the June issue of the People's Tribune, Adolph Reed discussed the Labor Party's campaign to enact a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution according to the following proposition: "Every person shall have the right to a job and to receive a livable wage for their work (defined as a minimum of $10/hour in 1997, indexed to inflation)." The article pointed out that such an amendment is necessary because, "It is clear that on its own the private economy does not create enough decent jobs for all who need them. We face a chronic job shortfall." His abridged article continues here. Why not seek this objective through congressional legislation, which would be easier to attain than a Constitutional amendment? The fate of the 1946 Employment Act and the 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Act shows the limitations of trying to secure the right to a job through legislative processes. Even though heavy majorities consistently have favored the idea in public opinion polls since the 1930s, corporate interests have been able to block or blunt attempts to legislate it. Embedding the guarantee of a job and livable wage in the Constitution would make it substantially more difficult to ignore. Moreover, building the kind of grass-roots, popular movement that would be necessary to amend the Constitution could transform the nature of political debate so that it would be far more difficult for politicians to dilute or side step the mandate. Besides, it is important for working people to make unambiguously clear that access to a livelihood must be a fundamental human right and that increasing productivity benefits us and does not bludgeon us into overwork and job insecurity. Where would the capital come from to pay for the massive public investment this amendment implies? Fulfilling the warrant of the Labor Party's proposed 28th Amendment certainly would require massive public investment. However, some of the cost of this investment would be offset by savings realized through curtailment of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program (AFDC), what is typically called "welfare." Federal AFDC expenditures for 1993 were more than $42 billion, which would be saved by guaranteeing a living wage job to all who can work. ****************************************************************** 6. NEW FREEDOM BUS CROSSES AMERICA, GATHERING TESTIMONY, DISPENSING HOPE [Sponsored by the National Welfare Rights Union and spearheaded by Philadelphia's Kensington Welfare Rights Union, the Economic Human Rights Campaign '98 is a national effort to highlight the economic human rights abuses in this country caused by welfare reform and poverty. (Economic human rights are mainly expressed in articles 23, 25 and 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in December 1948.)] During June, the New Freedom Bus -- Freedom from Unemployment, Hunger and Homelessness -- has been traveling around the country, collecting documentation of economic rights abuses and spotlighting the efforts of poor communities to survive and fight back. There have been rallies, marches and tribunals in conjunction with the bus tour in the cities the bus has visited. The documentation collected by the New Freedom Bus riders was to be taken to the United Nations in New York City for an international economic human rights tribunal on July 1, where a formal case against the United States was to be initiated. The bus riders have kept up a grueling schedule the past month, visiting 35 cities in 30 days. The riders have posted notices about their travels on the Kensington Welfare Rights Union's web site (http://www.libertynet.org/kwru/index.html). Below are excerpts from some of the postings that were available at press time. ALBANY AND ROCHESTER, NEW YORK Arriving in Albany, New York, the freedom riders dramatically marched into the "Does Work End Poverty?" conference just as Cheri Honkala, executive director of the Kensington Welfare Rights Union, began her address to the conference. Hosted at the State University of New York at Albany, the conference was a gathering of service providers, social-welfare advocates, academics, and representatives from a variety of other agencies and organizations. Cheri's message was direct: The only way that we're going to change things in this country is by building an organization, by building a massive movement capable of reaching the majority of people in this country. And like any struggle in history, it must be led by those most affected. However, people from all walks of life have an essential role to play. Before leaving the conference, the Freedom Bus Human Rights Choir performed on stage, receiving a standing ovation. Many at the conference showed their support for the bus riders. >From Albany, the bus traveled to Rochester, where we were hosted by a number of social-work students, recent social-work grads, and community members from various organizations. Like everywhere we have been, people in Rochester were hurting -- and dying -- from the economic changes taking place in this country. Massive downsizing by Kodak and Xerox have rocked Rochester. Welfare recipients of many different races told of their struggles to survive and meet the confusing and often contradictory new welfare rules. "It's not enough to beg for our freedom, it's not enough to try and lobby for our freedom, but we need to build an organization to take back this country so everyone is guaranteed, as human beings, the right to the basic necessities of life," was the message at the rally. One pastor told us how his church, with its poor congregation, was struggling for its survival. With new workfare requirements, much of his congregation can no longer attend church -- they have to work all Sunday (even though workfare jobs provide nowhere near living wages). LORAIN AND CLEVELAND, OHIO This area of Ohio was built around industry -- steel, the auto industry, etc. As our economy has changed, thousands and thousands of jobs have been downsized. In Cleveland, we heard speeches and testimony from a wide range of organizations in support of the campaign. We learned that 40 percent of people in Cleveland live in poverty. Recent laws have made it even more difficult to survive. But these struggles are largely invisible -- the major newspaper in the area, for example, fully supported welfare reform. Representatives from many important organizations came out to support the rally, including the United Electrical Workers, the Steelworkers Union, the STOP Coalition, the United Church of Christ, and many others. Before leaving, we were deeply moved by the words of street poet Daniel Thompson. Back in Lorain, we had a tribunal before a panel of influential community leaders. We heard testimony of people who, after working all their lives, found themselves without access to life- sustaining medication. We learned that 52 percent of welfare benefits in Ohio have been cut since welfare reform. Of those who have been dropped off the rolls, only one-third managed to actually "get off" welfare because they managed to find a job or their situation otherwise changed; the other two-thirds have been cut off of assistance because of sanctioning. And the rate at which people are dropped off the rolls continues to accelerate. The panel of community leaders signed a statement supporting the claims of economic human rights violations in Ohio. ON THE BUS There are educationals every day on the bus, on different topics relating to the Freedom Bus -- the economics, politics, history, etc., of different areas of the country, as well as discussions of our strategy for building a national movement. These educationals are conducted by different Freedom Bus riders. We plan and strategize for the days ahead. We rehearse different songs, and write new songs. Different individuals have many different responsibilities -- coordinating the logistics for the next few stops, writing about the trip, updating the web page, coordinating press contacts, and (as always) dealing with the crises of the day. BRADSHAW AND WELCH, WEST VIRGINIA They discovered coal in McDowell County around the turn of the century. At its peak in the 1950s, over 100,000 people worked here, extracting billions of dollars of the world's finest coal -- coal of such high quality that McDowell coal has been used to produce the finest steel in the country. Today, all those jobs are gone. But the coal hasn't stopped flowing. In fact, coal production is at an all-time high, while employment is at an all- time low. High-tech production has left this community with unemployment rates in excess of 90 percent. McDowell County has the fifth-highest poverty rate in the country and 60 percent of its children live in poverty. As the jobs disappeared, so have the people. Today, less than 30,000 people live here. Seven out of ten people have been forced to leave. Some, like Frances Patton-Rutherford, have families that have lived on this land for three centuries, and aren't prepared to leave. At our rally at Bradshaw City Hall, she said: "I have lived my life in loss. We've lost families. We've lost jobs. We've lost schools. We've lost our water system. This is our home. This is where we want to live. We don't want to go to North Carolina to work part time for Burger King, which someone in my family did last week. Many don't have the resources to leave. We are trying to get together and figure out a future here. "In a country as wealthy as ours, it is unabidable this growing divergence between rich and poor, between children who can see a doctor when they are sick, between children who can live in a safe house, between children who can get a quality education [and those who can't]. We can do better. I'm not willing to give up on my community, or my country." Frances is a board member of Big Creek People in Action and coordinator of the McDowell Family Resource Center. Cheri Honkala addressed the rally: "We bring you greetings from poor and homeless people across the nation. We are here today not to speak on behalf of the poor -- because we are the poor. What has happened to us that we won't even ask for food stamps? My mom didn't want to ask for food stamps; she felt ashamed, afraid that she had somehow failed. I want you all to repeat after me: I'm poor and I count! ... "We are here to hear from all of you here in West Virginia -- to take your very important struggles for survival to the United Nations -- not to beg for a future, but to demand a future for all of us. "Today marks a historic beginning in which we poor folks from the North begin to hook up with poor folks from the South, to let nothing divide us, to work together to create a new society free from hunger and poverty. As there is a piece of steel from McDowell County in all parts of the country, we will take the steel foundation of the leaders in McDowell County and use it to inspire all poor people throughout the nation to stand up and be heard, to speak for ourselves, and to no longer be silent. ... "For years both the Republican and Democratic parties have been telling us one thing before election day and another the day after they are elected. They tell us to get off the dole -- yet they don't create the jobs we need and that's why we are promoting the Labor Party's Right to a Job at a Living Wage Campaign. We are calling for a 28th Amendment to the Constitution saying, 'If you want us to work, give us a job that pays a living wage.' "From every holler to every housing project, we will inspire our sisters and brothers to leave their homes and join the fight. ... Together we will win." Rick Wilson of the American Friends Service Committee spoke about the long history of struggle and resistance to oppression by the people of West Virginia. He went on to explain the specifics of welfare reform in West Virginia. West Virginia is one of only five states which elected to count Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as family income. This decision, which affects at least 20,000 low-income West Virginians, was made by state administrators, and not by democratically elected officials. As a result of this policy, any family in which a member receives SSI payments for a disability is effectively denied state cash assistance. Wilson gave some examples of the effects of welfare reform in West Virginia. A family of nine lost state cash assistance due to SSI. They were forced to give up their home and move in with relatives. A father of five who is disabled and is the primary caregiver lost state cash assistance when welfare reform went into effect. The family's furniture was subsequently repossessed by a rent-to-own company. One family began receiving SSI when the father became paralyzed in an accident. Through Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and SSI, they were able to survive and buy a mobile home. Welfare reform went into effect and they now face the prospect of losing their home. The rally closed with an unexpected surprise: some of the young people on the Freedom Bus wrote and performed a song together. Here are the lyrics: We are going on the bus We are marching for our lives We are going on a bus For Freedom We want you to listen We want you to hear Our stories are important To live without fear We need our rights For we are human We need our rights For we are children We need our rights! HIGHLANDER AND KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE The Highlander Center has been an important place in grassroots organizing efforts since its founding in the 1930s. Rooted in ideas of popular education, it was a space where leaders of the Industrial Union movement of the 1930s and Civil Rights movement of the 1960s came to develop skills, theories and strategies. The Highlander has continued its historical role of supporting organizing efforts across the country. Our day at Highlander was a time to meet and strategize, looking at many of the different fronts on which this campaign is operating -- dealing with logistics, our communication strategy, the legal aspects of the campaign, and (as always, at the center of our discussions) continuing to build the efforts of the poor to organize ourselves across this country. Community groups like Solutions to Issues of Concern to Knoxvillians (SICK) and other organizations held a human rights picnic in Knoxville. We heard testimonies of people in Knoxville and on the bus who are struggling both to survive and to fight the conditions they are facing. There was also music by local musicians, poetry, and plenty of food to go around. Michelle Nored, a welfare recipient from Knoxville and an organizer, shared the following poem with us: Within my life I've made a choice, I spoke my mind, You've heard my voice. A simple life I've laid to rest So I could choose for me the best. So many folks have shown concern, And many heads my kids have turned. "Just why has she done that to them? Those kids are outcast from within." With curly hair and perfect tans, My kids were formed with God's own hands. "Just where does she think she gets off? Those kids will surely pay the cost!" A Welfare Mom no doubt, agreed? How else so many could she feed? "I'll bet they all end up in jail, With trash like that, they're sure to fail." "We're the ones that she should thank, For goodness sake we fill her tank. We buy her food, pay rent and lights, Just who is she to claim some rights?" They speak as though I'm not around; As if I'd dare not make a sound. For after all, you know they're right, Why should I stand up, fuss, or fight? I've got life easy, I've got life licked. Free Medicaid, food stamps, and WIC. What's wrong with me? Could I be wrong? I don't think so, I know I'm strong. For seven years I've fought the fight, Been kicked by men and shamed in spite. I've walked with kids a lot in rain, No car to drive and lots of pain. Yet look at me, I'm still upright, Been bumped and bruised, but still I fight. Too many moms don't have the strength To tell those folks just what they think. I think it's time to let them know, They can't do that, just tell them NO! You will not kill me, I will not quit. Why should I with this great wit? ****************************************************************** 7. MISERY GROWS IN CALIFORNIA By Ethel Long-Scott In California these days, a lot of political discussion focuses on how to spend an unprecedented state-budget surplus. But thanks to welfare reform, the future of millions of Golden State residents is anything but golden. The state program called CalWorks that replaced Aid to Families with Dependent Children has worsened the lives of the most destitute. Even as state coffers are overflowing, economic misery is increasing among large numbers of the working poor, and even some middle-income professionals are threatened. The Personal Responsibility and Family Act President Clinton signed in August, 1996 ended federal responsibility for any safety net for workers and the unemployed. It finished off the social contract that helped the United States out of the Depression, gave states money to set up new time-limited workfare programs, and accelerated the privatization of services that had been state- supplied. One result in California is that, with the approval of the twin parties of Capital, the Republicans and the Democrats, the private sector downsizing of the 1970s and 1980s is hitting the public sector with a vengeance. By census data, there are 3.6 million Californians living below the poverty line. More realistic figures go up to 6 million. Most are children. They are suffering the reduced benefits, denials of benefits, denials of basic health care and increased homelessness that we see everywhere in the country. At the same time, many state officials are pushing new adventuresome schemes for finance capital, thanks to California's budget surplus and reduced welfare costs. The new welfare-reform laws have resulted in the rulers stealing further from the poorest and most vulnerable. To prepare for welfare reform, the California Legislature took away money the counties used for small General Assistance and welfare stipends to the poorest of the poor. More than 180,000 state employees haven't received negotiated cost-of-living increases in five years. Hundreds of thousands of city, county and state workers have been laid off in a massive public- sector downsizing. We are witnessing the culmination of California's 50-year Pacific Rim Business Strategy accelerated by global capitalism. Computerized, automated manufacturing ended millions of U.S. blue- collar jobs and cheapened labor costs in the global world of work. The results are devastating to working-class cities like Oakland. Two generations ago, Oakland was a bustling manufacturing center with moderate to high- wage, blue-collar jobs. Unemployment was low. Many with less than a high school education could earn a livable wage to care for their families. Today, much of Oakland has shifted to an information-based economy of small firms, financial services, computer-consulting firms, and the shrinking public sector. Most of these jobs require moderately to highly skilled, computer-literate individuals, and pay a moderate wage of $10 per hour. Specialized service firms pay $15 plus. Unfortunately, Oakland's poorest residents can't get these jobs that pay higher than the minimum wage. The average pay for a person transitioning off welfare is $6.79 per hour, just $1.04 above the minimum wage of $5.75. No wonder the misery is spreading. At the same time, California just went through the most expensive election in its history. Two Democrats, both multimillionaires, spent $60 million on their primary campaigns, an average of $45 for each vote they got. California, like the rest of the nation, is at a crossroads. Will the rich keep getting fat at the expense of workers and their children? Will the tremendous economic engine of computerization continue to subsidize the business gambles of the rich, or will that wealth be turned to addressing the increasing unemployment and poverty experienced by nearly 6 million Californians? The answer rests with employed and unemployed together designing a future focused on economic security. "This time it's all of us or none of us." ****************************************************************** 8. WHY CALIFORNIANS DEFEATED PROPOSITION 226 by the Oakland Area of the LRNA The June election in California indicated a step-up in the moral battle for the hearts and minds of the working class. The issues centered on deception vs. morality and privilege vs. rights. California voters defeated Proposition 226, which would have forced unions to get written permission from every worker, every year, before they could spend money on political campaigns or issues. Proposition 226 would have silenced the voice of the labor movement, while leaving corporate political spending unrestricted. Corporations already outspend unions 11 to 1 on politics. The proposition was written and financed by out-of-state, conservative multimillionaires. Big-time business interests -- like the Chamber of Commerce and manufacturer organizations -- did not campaign for the measure, even though they would love to see unions completely destroyed. They are more concerned with a resurgent labor movement that articulates and fights for an independent agenda. To openly support Proposition 226 would have broken the status quo, the business unionism strategy that keeps labor contained. Initiatives in California are always sold in moral terms. Because the American people are a moral people, the interests of wealth are codified into law in the initiatives and are cloaked with appeals based on right and wrong, good or bad. Proposition 226 was not termed an anti-labor act; it was framed as "the paycheck protection act." Americans have a strong sense of "fair play" and were repulsed by 226's small print. The elections underscored the huge moral dilemma that confronts the working class. Voters have rejected Ross Perot multimillionaire clones that try to buy their way into office. Ronald Unz, a multimillionaire who authored the anti-bilingual education Proposition 227, was able to dupe the voters. Why is it so compelling to have millionaires, who would never send their kids to public school, propose solutions to social crises, in this case schools? For 50 years, the U.S. has been one of the few countries in the world to refuse to sign UN documents granting Americans economic human rights. Instead, the government sponsors "programs," which it doles out as privileges, not rights. You can't defeat an enemy if you accept his moral assumptions. Unz was successful -- as capitalists so often are on social issues -- in portraying the right to an education as a privilege for "special interests." When 20% of the people own 80% of everything, there is only one special interest -- the class that Ron Unz represents. Social issues are not "special interests." Its time to fight for rights not privileges, then "our tax money" is going to whom it should go to -- us! By defeating Proposition 226 unions discovered they could generate some power. They were right to say that the voice of labor must not be silenced. But now what? Do we sit and wait for the next right-wing initiative before we act again? Do we use labor's voice to uncritically support the Democratic candidate for governor? Or do we voice the moral imperative of human rights and force it into the political arena? The 1998 elections are raising important and critical issues. We are interested in starting some dialogue. Send e-mail on this topic to: www.nanoforth@hotmail.com ****************************************************************** 9. OUR ADVICE: DON'T BE POOR IN MISSOURI AND KANSAS By the Kansas City Area Office of the League of Revolutionaries for a New America Kansas City is thought to be the heart of one of the most economically buoyant parts of the country. But welfare reform and federal cutbacks are hurting the area in dramatic ways. Perhaps because Kansas and Missouri are particularly ill-prepared for welfare reform, the Center on Hunger and Poverty ranks Missouri 44th and Kansas 49th as the states with the worst welfare policies for helping poor families improve their economic situations. In the past five years, 100,000 people have been slashed from Missouri's welfare rolls, the number of people in area shelters has doubled, and Missouri has seen an 11 percent statewide increase in homelessness. In Kansas City, homelessness has increased by 30 percent over the past two years. On the Kansas side, relatively wealthy Johnson County has at least 42,000 people below the poverty line, outnumbering the total residents in 70 of Kansas' 105 counties. Rural poverty is common in both states; it is perhaps most vivid in Southeast Missouri, where 39 percent of the children live in poverty and 40 percent of new mothers lack a high school diploma. With federal funds slashed, 13,000 Missouri families seek assistance from private agencies each month. In Kansas City, Kansas, at least one federally funded medical clinic has run out of money and is only seeing emergency, obstetric and hospital patients. Also on the Kansas side (Wyandotte County), workfare puts mothers to work with only 19 day care slots for every 100 children who need them; 31 percent of the area's toddlers are currently dependent on public assistance. ****************************************************************** 10. A VISION FOR OUR CITIES By Hollis Glaser The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider. Our inner cities are being destroyed by drugs and racism, by a lack of jobs, and by a government which has removed social- support programs. The poisoning of the Earth becomes more extensive and irreversible every year. Multinational corporations accrue greater and greater power while destroying traditional societies in the quest to make more profit. What is needed is a clear vision of an alternative way of life. Imagine living in a building which was energy-efficient and used renewable energy -- wind power and solar power -- so you had no electric or power bills to worry about. Now imagine being part of a community-based economic system where everyone is valued for what they bring to it. Where everyone benefits from the work of everyone else, and where there is no "top" or "bottom." Briefly, the system works as a credit union based on goods and services people provide, instead of on money. So, when one person helps another buy groceries, or fix some furniture, or babysit, their accounts are appropriately credited and debited. In this way, they are both free to trade with someone else, or not all. There is no inflation in this system, no unemployment or underemployment. People are free to engage in a variety of tasks, and everyone who wants to participate can offer whatever skills or goods they have. This is a system based on trust; the only way for it to work is for people to trust that everyone will do their share. As people trade, the system grows stronger. As the system grows stronger, people's trust in one another strengthens. As their trust grows, so they build stronger relationships and develop community. So, many, maybe all, of your basic needs can be attained without needing money. Imagine living in a community where everyone's energy sources were renewable, so that there are no monthly utility bills, and everyone has what they need. Imagine that the food you eat comes from local farmers who are a part of the trading system. Imagine that everyone's basic needs were taken care of, that people had plenty of free time, and no one depended upon an outside bankroll in order to survive. In other words, imagine that the community took care of its members. Although this might seem far-fetched, it is how humanity survived for thousands of years, and how many are still surviving. It is only recently, in the past few hundred years, that this traditional way of life has broken down. All of these technologies and systems are currently available; we have the means to put them into operation. What we need, however, is the political will. For more information and contact with others working on these issues, call or write to: Grassroots Economic Organizing Newsletter; P.O. Box 5065, New Haven, CT 06525; 203-389-6194. Real Goods ( for renewable technologies); 555 Leslie street, Ukiah, CA, 95482-5507; 707-468-9292 x2210. Co-op America (a network of various activists, goods and services); 2100 M Street NW, Suite 403, Washington, D.C.; 800- 424-2667. ****************************************************************** 11. STRIKE! UAW WORKERS WALK THE WALK By Claire McClintock FLINT, Michigan -- Shortly after 10 a.m. on June 5, United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 659 vented months of pent-up frustration and marched out the East Gate door at the Flint Metal Center. Led out with both the UAW and American flags, the workers carried "UAW on Strike" signs and shouted "U-A-W!" They were met at the gate with hugs, handshakes and high fives by scores of other Metal Fab employees as well as union members from other UAW locals from around the Flint area. Shouting, jeering and howling we marched to the main road and were met with honks of horns from vans and trucks alike driving up and down Bristol Road. It was exhilarating to be able to flex our union muscle. AN EXPLOSION WAITING TO HAPPEN Conflicts at General Motors (GM) have grown in recent years with seven strikes called by UAW last year. At the Flint Metal Center, labor woes surfaced when in 1994 the local contract was opened and replaced with a new "competitive" agreement. The contract disrupted long-standing and hard-won work rules, work standards and classifications. Workers could not reconcile GM's record-breaking profits and new hi-tech investments with the deterioration of workplace dignity. However, GM played the "job" card, promising future work. This included a letter of agreement signed by the division vice president promising cradle and other work, including "A/W" and "G" cradles. The membership reluctantly passed the special agreement. Last year's regular contract talks brought even more demands by management, squeezing out more workplace changes. GM announced a $300 million investment to try and offset the controversy. This time, the workers flatly rejected the contract. However, it was brought back to vote and the contract passed by a slim margin. PROMISES MADE, PROMISES BROKEN In February of this year, Regional Manager Tom Brody of the GM Metal Fabricating Division informed the UAW that cradle work would in fact not be coming to the Metal Fabricating Plant. He also added that other anticipated project work was now in question. Negotiations soon began to try and resolve the issue. In the meantime, management abuses and harassment on the shop floor, and even on the gates, escalated along with mounting unresolved grievances. The Shop Committees asked for and received an overwhelming authorization to strike. Authorization does not mean the plant will automatically strike. It just means that it may strike. On Sunday afternoon of the Memorial Day weekend, while Metal Fab workers were out of the plant, management locked all the gates, turned off all of the telephones, hustled in scab workers and truckers to a plant dock, and, like "thieves in the night," rushed GMT 800 dies out of the door. These dies are needed to produce the new extended-cab pick-up truck to be launched in the fall. With a strike threat looming, GM needed to protect what is considered one of the most important new products in years. At this point, cooperation and the bargaining table itself were null and void. When they moved the dies, they called the Union out. The following Wednesday, the International Union issued a 5-day notice to strike. A DAYTON REPLAY WITH HIGHER STAKES The 17-day UAW strike at Dayton, Ohio in 1996 shut GM down. The Flint facility carries some of the same features. Like Dayton, the issue here is work promised to us that GM refuses to deliver. And like Dayton, the Flint plant could shut down GM in a matter of days. The plant is the producer of sheet-metal parts, hoods, finders, as well as engine cradles, impacting a number of auto products and virtually all truck production. The situation gives tremendous leverage to the UAW. Finally, like Dayton, we face a formidable adversary with deep pockets (GM ate $900 million in losses as a result of the Dayton Strike). But this is where the similarities end. First of all, Flint has the largest concentration of GM workers in the world (approximately 33,000 workers, down from 77,000 workers in the late 1970s). Flint is the birthplace of the UAW -- not just a union town, but UAW country. The emotional ties and commitment to the contributions of the labor movement cannot be underestimated. Of the seven area UAW locals in the Flint area, five have taken and approved strike votes. Within days of sneaking the dies out of Metal Fab, state and local governments had just given GM tax breaks to build a new engine plant, hiring 700 displaced workers to the tune of a staggering $53,000 per worker. GLOBAL COMPETITION: WHO BENEFITS? We, the workers, cannot live with the downsizing, plant closings, worker intimidation and harassment. We cannot reconcile GM's record-breaking profits built on the backs of a community whose unemployment rate is 25% with an ever-growing new class of jobless, part-time, temporary and otherwise disposable workers, many of whom are our children and grandchildren. This strike is then about our families, our children and our community vs. the GM corporate family and its bottom line. GM is aggressively carving out its own niche in the global market. The hi-tech revolution is sending shock waves around the world, and capitalists like GM are joining the party. "We must get competitive to survive in the global economy" bombards GM on the shop floor, at the bargaining table, and in the media. We have learned the hard way that this "competitiveness" is a code word for reducing labor cost. This is done primarily by investing in labor-replacing equipment such as robots. As a back-up, GM seeks to exploit the cheapest labor possible, be it Mexico, China, or the sweatshops sprawled along the I-75 corridor. In our heart of hearts, we knew when we walked out of the plant that we carried with us the aspirations and hopes of a closing Buick City, a barely open V-8 plant, a sold Carpenter Road plant, as well as a battle-weary Chevrolet Manufacturing Complex. A victory at Metal Fab is critical. Without it, the good life that our founding members fought for and passed on to us (without a strike fund or a bargaining table) may take years to recoup. ****************************************************************** +----------------------------------------------------------------+ WOMEN AND REVOLUTION: VISIONS FOR A NEW AMERICA The purpose of this column is to open debate on all issues concerning women today. We see it as a place where women can discuss and debate strategies for winning women's equality and improving women's status. This is critical to our playing our historic role of leading in the building of a new America. Send your articles, 300 words or less, to People's Tribune Women's Desk at pt@noc.org +----------------------------------------------------------------+ 12. 'THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL MY SON' By Sandra Reid "For as long as I can remember, my [grand]mother and I have gone to the prison every Friday night to visit my dad. When I was little, I used to crawl up the bars, not knowing that the state wanted to kill my father. It wasn't until I got older that I knew this was not normal." -- Maria Dicks, age 19. Maria's grandmother, Shirley Dicks, has spent every waking minute for 21 years fighting to save her son from execution on Tennessee's Death Row. She is disabled and lives with her brother- in-law because she lost her home. Still, she managed to raise her granddaughter, write six books and speak all over the country against the death penalty and prison abuse. The People's Tribune asked Shirley what she has learned. "The thing that stands out is that you can't trust the system," she said. "There are abuses and brutality in prison after prison. The whole system is a money-making project. The more prisoners, the more money they get. They're not even trying to rehabilitate. You can steal a loaf of bread and get 20 years." Jeff Dicks, her son, almost died from a heart attack recently because the prison waited three days, until he almost passed out from pain, before sending him for care. "I went on the web and thousands of letters came in, so the prison had to respond. Unless you have someone fighting for you, you won't be heard. That's why I'm looking for stories for my new book on prison brutality. I'm trying to bring the injustices and brutality to the public, because things are turning backward. I want people to know that if you are treated like an animal, you're going to come out of prison angry and an innocent person could take the brunt of it." Shirley wants her new book to refute the notion that being in prison is like hotel living. "People should visit and see how the prisoners fight to stay alive," she says. "It looks like they're breeding a bunch of animals. In a Georgia prison, a warden applauded guards who were banging prisoners heads against the wall. The brutality is not just a few bad guards. "A woman with AIDS in a California prison had convulsions and died after she had to stand in the rain to get medical care. Guards thought she was faking. In the men's prison, guards put different gang members together and bet on who would win the fight. Then they shoot rubber bullets. They've killed seven prisoners." Shirley says she keeps up her strength because: "I'm fighting to save Jeff's life. It doesn't matter where you stand on the issue of the death penalty, an innocent man's life is at stake." Shirley Dicks is a member of Murder Victims Families for Reconciliation, Amnesty International, Journiers For Justice and Tennessee Friends Outside. She also has a prison ministry. She has been on talk shows and the British Broadcasting Corporation did a documentary on her life. She is available to speak through Speakers for a New America. Call 773-486-3551; write to Box 3524, Chicago, Illinois 60654; or e-mail speakers@noc.org Editor's note: Time is running out. Jeff Dicks will go to Federal Court this summer and does not have an attorney. To help, e-mail sdicks@bellsouth.net or visit http://members.xoom. com/jdicks/index.htm +----------------------------------------------------------------+ Shirley Dicks, an author and mother of a Death Row inmate in Tennessee, is looking for prisoners' stories about guard brutality in the prison system or medical abuse. Write to Shirley Dicks, P.O. Box 321, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130 or e-mail sdicks@bellsouth.net +----------------------------------------------------------------+ ****************************************************************** 13. INVOKING THE SPIRIT OF MERLE AFRICA: ONA MOVE! By Steve Wiser Imagine, if you can, leaving prison -- in a coffin. Imagine spending nineteen and a half years of your life in jail for a crime you did not commit and could not have committed. Imagine while in prison hearing from a passing guard that eleven of your family, including babies, have been bombed and burned alive. On March 13, 1998, Merle Austin Africa was pronounced dead. The Pittsburgh Post Gazette covered the event in a minuscule, well- buried snippet, stating, "Austin was serving time for killing a Philadelphia police officer." Nothing could possibly be further from the truth, or a more blatant lie. Merle Austin Africa and eight other members of a spiritual group known as MOVE were convicted for the murder of a Philadelphia police officer, James Ramp. Officer Ramp was shot on August 8, 1978 with one bullet that entered his head from above and behind. The members of MOVE were below and in front of Officer Ramp and immersed in water to their necks. How could nine people shoot one bullet? How could they shoot any bullet while struggling to keep their mouths above water? They were not charged with weapons possession. How then could they shoot without weapons? They were charged with aggravated assault. Who assaulted whom when over one hundred police in riot gear attacked their 33rd St. house? They were charged with conspiracy and multiple counts of attempted murder. Who conspired and who attempted to murder whom when a police officer testified there was "an excessive amount of unnecessary firing on the part of the police personnel when there were no targets, per se, to shoot at," and when a stake-out officer admitted under oath that he had emptied his carbine into the very basement from which he heard screaming women and children. In spite of all of this, the MOVE members were sentenced to 30 to 100 years each by Judge Malmed who, days later, stated, "I haven't the faintest idea who shot Officer Ramp." When I first heard this account, I couldn't believe it. Over the following three years, I visited prisons across the state, interviewed eight of the nine MOVE members, talked with the trial lawyers, read transcripts, talked with eye witnesses and journalists, viewed film footage of the event, and read every book on the subject I could get a hold of. The verdict I found was simple and horrifying: a tremendous, soul-searching injustice has taken place in this case. The MOVE members, a people of strong character and deep spirituality, sit in prison- today for a crime they did not commit. They have been there almost twenty years now and are sentenced for 10 to 80 more years. And one of them, a close and dear friend, will be imprisoned no more. Only through death could she be released. How many more will follow before justice is established? If MOVE members are not guilty of murder, aggravated assault, attempted murder and so on, why are they in prison? Using extracts of letters from Merle herself, I will let her words speak for themselves, of the faith, conviction and beliefs of her people, of why they are imprisoned: "MOVE people are in jail for telling the people who run the government to stop exploiting and polluting the Earth, because they're killing it. They put us in jail because we wouldn't shut up, wouldn't stop exposing the wrongness of the government. Since they felt they couldn't beat us into stop talking and giving people information, they tried killing our babies ( we lost five), beating our men, beating women and pregnant women unmercifully, and unjustly jailing us, like they gave us 30 to 100 year sentences, and, in their desperation to stop MOVE, they murdered my 11 brothers and sisters. "But, through all the brutality, it hasn't stopped us, hasn't made us weak or made us give up, because what's goin' on, on this Earth, the wars, the racism, religious and racial prejudice, the exploitation of the animals, plants, all species of life, has GOT to stop or there won't be any Earth left that we'd recognize. "The fight MOVE is fighting isn't just for us, it's for all people, all species, because anybody can be victimized, be murdered or thrown in prison. ... The reason the government did these things to MOVE was because they felt they could get away with it and nobody would say anything. And, from 1973 to 1985, nobody did. But people saw how sick, vicious and brutal the government is on May 13, 1985, when they murdered my family, and people said 'Hey, wait a minute, what's going on here?' People woke up and realized that if they can do it to MOVE, they can do it to them too, and that's what is so frightening. ... "A lot of people don't understand that MOVE's work ain't fighting cops and going to prison -- those things came about because of our uncompromising stand for what's right. MOVE stands for family, love, happiness, health, and we experience all these in MOVE, it's what keeps us going in times like these. ... +----------------------------------------------------------------+ THE COLOR OF JUSTICE ... GREEN! Above the entrance to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington are inscribed the words, "Equal Justice Under The Law." This is a very noble principle at the very least, but consider this: Five, maybe six, of the court's nine justices are millionaires and the other three aren't that bad off, either. In late May, the justices filed reports of their holdings, as required of them and other federal judges under the law. This law is conveniently loose. They are allowed to estimate their worth within a broad range, not to the exact penny. They also must report gifts and other reimbursements, while personal property and the value of a primary residence are exempt, according to the Associated Press. Just the same, the numbers are interesting. The two richest justices were appointed by President Clinton! They are Ruth Bader Ginsburg ($5.9 million to $24.1 million for her and her husband) and Stephen G. Breyer ($4.3 million to $15.9 million for his family). The other justices: Sandra Day O'Connor, $2.3 million to $5.6 million. David H. Souter, $1.1 million to $5.3 million. John Paul Stevens, $1.29 million to $2.74 million. Antonin Scalia, $675,000 to $1.59 million. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, $210,000 to $590,000. Anthony M. Kennedy, $30,000 to $280,000. Clarence Thomas, $30,000 to $175,000. Justice may be equal under the law, but the justices are more equal than a lot of us, regardless. +----------------------------------------------------------------+ ****************************************************************** 14. SIMUEL RAMEY SETS AN EXAMPLE LRNA gives award to revolutionary who heroically sells the People's Tribune and Tribuno Del Pueblo [Simuel Ramey, a member of the Oakland, California Chapter of the LRNA, was given an award by the Third Convention of the LRNA for his eight years of work circulating the People's Tribune and Tribuno del Pueblo.] By Chris Mahin In April, Simuel Ramey received an award from the League of Revolutionaries for a New America for his work in distributing the revolutionary press. He earned it. Simuel has been selling the People's Tribune in Oakland, California for eight years. For more than five of those years, he has sold about 350 copies of each issue. "The People's Tribune is the educational tool I use to wake up the masses," he said during an interview, just days after receiving the award at the LRNA's Third Convention. In a wide-ranging conversation, Simuel described his role in circulating revolutionary newspapers. His customers come from all walks of life; they range from a bus driver to two members of the Oakland City Council. They include people of all different races and nationalities. (And Simuel also sells the Tribuno del Pueblo, the bilingual sister publication of the People's Tribune, in the predominantly Latino Fruitvale section of Oakland.) Simuel sells the revolutionary press from noon until 6 p.m. every day, at locations ranging from supermarkets to the city's posh Jack London Square. Some people pay as much as one dollar for a single copy. After the Oakland Chapter elected him a delegate to the LRNA's Third Convention, Simuel paid his travel expenses from money he made selling newspapers. He traveled to Chicago on a Greyhound bus -- and sold the revolutionary press in every city where that bus stopped along the way. Simuel has been arrested four times for selling the People's Tribune and Tribuno del Pueblo in Oakland. His most memorable run- in with the police took place on November 2, 1997, when he was arrested on a trumped-up charge of distributing without a license. The case was taken before Judge David Krashna. When the arresting officer showed the court one of the People's Tribunes which Simuel had been selling, Judge Krashna said, "But officer, I buy this newspaper from this man." The judge dismissed the case when the prosecution could not cite any legal statute making it illegal for Simuel to sell his newspapers. Because he has relentlessly defended his First Amendment right to circulate newspapers, Simuel has forced the Oakland police to leave him alone. "Now the cops don't bother me at all," he explained. "They wave at me." If you would like to distribute a bundle of the People's Tribune and the Tribuno del Pueblo like Simuel Ramey does, contact the National Circulation Committee of the LRNA by calling 773-486-3551 or by sending e-mail to chris@noc.org ****************************************************************** 15. SPEAKERS FOR A NEW AMERICA Our speakers provide a message of hope and unity to create a society whose wealth benefits all. Our speakers speak from the point of view of the most destitute and what is needed to solve their problems. Our speakers speak from the point of view of what is in the best interest of all of society -- not what is in the interest of a handful of billionaires. For a free brochure, write to P.O. Box 3524, Chicago, Illinois 60654; send e-mail to speakers@noc.org; or call 773-486-3551. NEW BOOKLET ON TAPE We are pleased to announce that "Moving Onward: From Racial Division to Class Unity," a new pamphlet by Brooke Heagerty and Nelson Peery, is now available on audiotape. The labor for this project was donated thanks to Donna and Mike Thornton. Send $10, plus $2 shipping, to the address above. ****************************************************************** ABOUT THE PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE The PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE, published every two weeks in Chicago, is devoted to the proposition that an economic system which can't or won't feed, clothe and house its people ought to be and will be changed. To that end, this paper is a tribune of the people. It is the voice of the millions struggling for survival. It strives to educate politically those millions on the basis of their own experience. It is a tribune to bring them together, to create a vision of a better world, and a strategy to achieve it. Join us! Editor: Laura Garcia Publisher: League of Revolutionaries for a New America, P.O. Box 477113, Chicago, IL 60647 (773) 486-0028 ISSN# 1081-4787 For free electronic subscription, email: pt-dist@noc.org with the word "subscribe" in the subject. To help support the production and distribution of the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE, please send donations, letters, articles, photos, graphics and requests for information, subscriptions and requests for bundles of papers to: PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE P.O. Box 3524 Chicago, IL 60654 pt@noc.org Reach us by phone: Chicago: (773) 486-3551 Atlanta: (404) 242-2380 Baltimore: (410) 467-4769 Detroit: (313) 839-7600 Los Angeles: (310) 428-2618 Washington, D.C.: (202) 529-6250 Oakland, CA: (510) 464-4554 GETTING THE PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE IN PRINT The PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE is available at many locations nationwide. One year subscriptions $25 ($50 institutions), bulk orders of 10 or more 15 cents each, single copies 25 cents. Contact PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE, P. O. Box 3524, Chicago, Illinois 60654, tel. (773) 486- 3551. WRITING FOR THE PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE We want your story in the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE. Send it in! Articles should be shorter than 300 words, written to be easily understood, and signed. (Use a pen name if you prefer.) Include a phone number for questions. Contact PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE, P. O. Box 3524, Chicago, IL 60654, tel. (773) 486-3551. ****************************************************************** We encourage reproduction and use of all articles except those copyrighted. Please credit the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE. The PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE depends on donations from its readers -- your generosity is appreciated. For free electronic subscription, email: pt-dist@noc.org with a message of "subscribe". ******************************************************************