Letters Did capitalists fund communists? Salute, MIMs! One night I was listening to a radio program and this guy who wrote a book on 'secret societies' was saying to the host that communism was created and funded by capitalism! Others claim that the Ford Foundation (a capitalist monopoly) funded communist organizations here and abroad! What's yal's take on these issues? What I know so far about communism, and this is for those honest and truthful communists, I believe that communism is something great, but I keep hearing that communism is no better than democracy, socialism, etc., because it's just terms used and ultimately just to control people worldwide, by people who don't believe in those systems. But I strongly believe for the simple fact that we're all humans and deserve to be treated equally and no race should be above any other and that any race suffering any forms of oppression should have a non-negotiable right by any means to free its race and its territories even if those forms are taking place legally. Now for the moment I will conclude my letter and until next time and in leaving yal say, wish yal good health and keep the non-negotiable fight on until the whole world is free. --A Texas Prisoner, May 2000 MIM responds: This is one of those questions that reinforces MIM's opinion that a scientific approach is the only way to cut through the noise and make the right political decisions. That means we don't care who the individual is who says something, we just want to know if what the person says is correct or useful. As soon as we start putting too much stake in who the speaker is, we put ourselves at risk for having it turned against us. Next thing you know Colin Powell and Clarence Thomas are right because they're "Black." But to get back to your question specifically, most of these arguments are simply the rantings of rabid chauvinists, like the John Birch Society. Usually these crackpot theories are anti- Semitic, calling up the old bullshit about a worldwide Zionist conspiracy between Jewish capitalists and communists. These shibboleths have no basis in fact. There are, however, instances when one camp of capitalists have helped communists for their own reasons. Perhaps the most famous example is the German government arranging to smuggle Lenin back into Russia during World War I. The Kaiser was no friend to communism; he simply hoped Lenin would cause trouble and weaken the bourgeois Russian state. Lenin shrewdly used the conflict between the German and Russian capitalists to advance the Russian revolution. As for the Ford Foundation, it is an offshoot of the Ford company, and does have a pro-capitalist agenda even while it funds some progressive or pseudo-progressive things. It has a long history of funding liberal alternatives to radicalism, partly in an attempt to buy off radicals. (One thing the Ford Foundation helped pay for was the "Eyes on the Prize" documentary series. MIM shows some of these documentaries because they have good information and footage in them. At the same time, we're very clear that the ideology expressed by their creators is reformist and not revolutionary.) The Ford Foundation may even have funded people who called themselves communists. That doesn't say anything about communist ideas one way or another, though. If you work for the prisoncrats and make $5 and send it to MIM as a donation to pay for newspapers, should we say MIM is suspect because it profits from prison labor? Similarly, many people also say that communism is a "European" invention, and therefore that it's not appropriate for Third World peoples. But China was the biggest country to apply Marxism, and the country to take socialism farther than any other. It was the responsibility of the Chinese communists to do the best thing they could in their time and place, to overthrow imperialism and bring a revolution to China, to stop the exploitation, starvation, foot- binding, and disease that plagued the Chinese people. They used communist ideas to do it. In their success, they should thank those whose ideas helped them; but in their failures they can't blame someone else's ideas, no matter where they came from. The question for us has to be: do these ideas help us get where we want to go, where the oppressed majority of the world need to go? With the scientific method, we can investigate the effect of communism, and Maoism in particular, and know that it has done more to help the oppressed than any other ideology. We can't throw that away just because some bad people have called themselves communists and even Maoists -- as some certainly have. We have to be able to see through the false communists by understanding the ideology they put forward. Only with a scientific analysis of this ideology can we distinguish true communists from people posing as communists but really supporting imperialism. Dutch citizen victim of u.s. criminal injustice system I am a citizen of the Netherlands, a political prisoner condemned to mandatory life imprisonment in the state of Michigan. On April 5, 2000 I marked my 15th year in prison for a crime I am truly innocent of. The police and the prosecutors were corrupt and used perjury to obtain my conviction, which I can now prove by way of a video recording and photographs. And attorney in Detroit has recently learned of the evidence proving that 5 police officers in the second largest city in the state of Michigan (Grand Rapids) committed perjury to frame me of a capital offense. Police corruption in framing innocent people is not just limited to places like Los Angeles, or the state of Illinois. It happened here in Michigan, to me. I desperately need help to expose what the police did in my case to frame me. My rights under international law were also violated (the Vienna Convention of Consular Relations) just as in the cases of: Angel Breard (the Paraguayan citizen executed in Virginia), Joseph Faulder (the Canadian citizen executed in Texas), and The Kegrand Brothers (The German citizens executed in Arizona). The United States is a superpower that points the finger at all other nations for international law violations, but seems to answer to nobody when they themselves violate international law and human rights. I am trying to bring attention to my dilemma being trapped in the prison system as a result of police officials' violation of international law. I believe that by exposing the United States' continued violation of international law to the rest of the world and to Americans, that I may be able to cause so much embarrassment that they would either have to stop pointing the finger at other nations, or make right their wrongs. I wish I could be transferred to the Netherlands in accordance with the treaty on the transfer on sentenced persons, and I'm hoping to elicit your help to bring attention to my predicament. The President of the United States entered into this treaty on behalf of all of the United States. The US senate ratified the treaty, giving it equal status as a supreme federal law of the land of America. Only the US (as a whole nation) is a party to the treaty, yet the US State Departments has delegated compliance with the treaty to the individual states even though they are not actual parties to the treaty. By delegating compliance to the Individual states for non-compliance instead of putting the blame where it rightly belongs, on the Secretary of State and ultimately the President. I have been suffering horribly for over a whole year now because prison officials have denied me personal hygiene items, refused to give me legal mail postage loans to mail out my legal mail, and have been seizing 100% of every cent that comes into my prison account toward a $5, 469.60 debt (in violation of Federal Law 28 U.S.C. 1915, which says that they may only take 20%) while also denying me indigent benefits, leaving me destitute. An international journalist, Anton Foex, in Amsterdam wanted to interview me and do a radio and television documentary about my case and how the Americans are torturing, but the Warden denied him access to me because of some new prison policy which bans media access to prisoner. The journalist has already done a few magazine articles in the Netherlands about my situation (they are printed in the Dutch language). If you'd like to see them, I can arrange to have someone send you a copy. There are many well-known people in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal who have been trying to bring attention to his case, and I can only hope that such support, such help, is not just limited to his case, but that his supporters and organizations such as MIM would also be interested in exposing international injustices and inhumane treatment of foreign nationals like myself. I desperately need supporters to rally for my cause too, especially now that my attorney has discovered proof of police corruption in the second largest city in Michigan. It is my understanding there are over 60 foreign national on death row in American prisons whose rights under the Vienna Convention were violated. Will they also be murdered like the Paraguayan, the German, and the Canadian, before the spotlight on the continued violations of international law and human rights, and in particular, to put the spotlight on how I was framed by corrupt cops and deprived of my liberty. Any help that you could provide, even names and addresses of activists of people of action that I might be able to get in contact with, would be appreciated. At the present time, I am totally being denied communication or access to the Netherlands Embassy or Consulate. Prison officials refuse to transmit my correspondence to them, and now have instituted a new phone system which prevents me from even calling the consular post. I desperately need people on the outside here in America that care about injustices and are willing to try and help, people who are not afraid to get involved. Please Respond to my call for help. -- A Michigan Prisoner, 26 May 2000 MIM responds: This letter exposes the united snakes violation of international treaty law, something that should not come as a surprise to regular readers of MIM Notes. The u.s. does not hesitate to violate even its own laws when that suits its purpose. The u.s. criticizes other countries for violating international law and even acts as an international police force to enforce these laws. But the u.s. will invade other countries whenever it is convenient and maintains a prison system which violates both international and domestic law demonstrating the hypocrisy of imperialism. We are under no illusions that this exposure will cause the system to change fundamentally. Significant embarrassment may cause the u.s. to give in on a few individual cases but it will take revolution to get rid of the system that continues to lock up innocent people in the name of social control masquerading as democracy. MIM does a lot of work exposing individual cases of injustice as a part of building public opinion against imperialism. These cases provide clear illustration of the bankrupt criminal injustice system which is a necessary part of imperialism. We want people to read about these injustices and understand the system that needs to be changed. In this way we educate and organize for revolutionary change. Don't vote: agitate against imperialism I'm looking forward for MIM to expose the contradictions in Amerika's political arena, because many down-trodden oppressed (poor Afrikans, Europeans, Mexicans and Natives, etc.) seem to have a false notion that voting Republican or Democratic offers hope, dreams and opportunity. As I watched C-SPAN and CNN today, I couldn't help but notice that both parties were portraying concerns for the minorities in this kountry. But the percentage of the minorities in prison wasn't a concern. In my hometown, I see that poor people are given brand new Habitat homes and I wonder if this is done out of a political motive. True enough, it is good that low-income individuals are being helped rather than living in projects, but why are these homes just being built in the same sector of town -- where poor folks live? Why not put some of these homes in the north, east and west? -- an Indiana prisoner, 1 August, 2000. MIM responds: We believe that voting in the Amerikan elections is a waste of time. It is much better that we all spend our time building support for the anti-imperialist struggles of the oppressed nations, and building our own proletarian institutions rather than legitimizing those of the bourgeoisie. This comrade is correct to call out the most important issues facing the oppressed nations within u.$. borders today, and we welcome additional such letters to add to our arsenal of reasons not to vote. Prisons are institutions of internal semi-colonialism. Readers with other candidates for "Proletarian issues not addressed in the Amerikan elections" should write in with their comments. But we also point out that no election for the Amerikan government could truly do anything to address the needs of the oppressed nations of the world without recognizing that the vast majority live outside u.$. borders even as they are subject to Amerikan military and economic policy. MIM is critical of such programs as Habitat for Humanity -- wherever in Amerika they build houses -- because they do not address the basic needs of the international proletariat. People in this country who are making minimum wage and have a place to live are having their basic needs met. On an international scale there are almost no low income or poor people in this country. The international majority, in whose interests we organize, do not have such basic things as food to eat every day or shelter from the weather. Rather than call for more equality among people in this country, we work for an end to international oppression.