- Chapter 3 - - Building New Railways, Waterways, and Highways - Three times in the past twelve years, Lyndon LaRouche has put before the U.S. electorate proposals for rebuilding the nation's transportation grid. Such proposals were key features of his economic recovery programs in the 1980 election campaign, again in 1984, and also in 1988. LaRouche told people that the deregulation of trucking, airlines, and railroads which had been launched during the presidency of Jimmy Carter in 1978, and has continued to this day thanks to the ``magic-of-the-market-place'' free enterprise fanatics of the Reagan and Bush administrations, was {economically insane}, and a sure recipe for disaster. Was he right, or not? The disaster LaRouche warned of over more than a decade ago has already happened. @sb|{Air Traffic:} Before deregulation, U.S. airlines were world leaders. Where are they now? The once-proud flag fleet, led by Pan Am, Trans World, and Eastern is either in bankruptcy court, or about to be. Equipment replacement and maintenance schedules have been sacrificed to the debts incurred in the course of post-deregulation price wars and leveraged buy-outs. Consolidation of carriers has concentrated traffic in fewer and fewer, but larger and larger airports. The result? Traffic congestion in the air and on the ground and millions of passenger-hours wasted ({Figure 1}). No new airport has been built since 1978. @sb|{Railroads:} 1980 passage of the Staggers ``RRRR'' Act did for the post-Penn Central bankruptcy railroad system what deregulation did to airlines. Mergers and the so-called consolidation of the industry have cut railroad employment in half, and track mileage by 25%. The production of railroad rolling stock--locomotives, passenger cars and freight cars--plummeted to below 500 for each category in 1989 ({Figure 2}). @sb|{Highways:} To keep the nation's highway system as it is, pot-holes, collapsing bridges and all, would require government expenditures in the order of $100 billion per year. To maintain the present capacity of the congested system would require a 30% increase in urban highway miles before the end of the decade. To keep up with population growth, $150 billion and more would have to be allocated {each year} by government, for highway construction and maintenance. The Surface Transportation Act passed into law before Christmas, provides $150 billion over the next five years. Economic costs of congestion have already exceeded spending on the highways in some parts of the country. @sb|{Waterways:} There is no East Coast or Gulf Coast port capable of handling the size of vessel--in excess of 100,000 tons--which for the last generation has been the standard in world shipping. Long Beach and Puget Sound on the West Coast can handle bulk carriers up to 150,000 tons. The Louisiana Off-shore Oil Port (LOOP) can handle large oil tankers. But the U.S.A. is no longer producing large ships ({Figure 3}). The famed St. Lawrence Seaway was rendered obsolete before it opened to traffic, because of the growth in international vessel size. Great Lakes traffic is further constrained by refusal to invest in improvements at the Welland Canal and locks at Sault St. Marie. Internal waterways, such as the Monongahela and Allegheny reaches of the upper Ohio River have been constrained by lack of investment in the improvement of locks and dams. Separately, each of these crises is a matter of the nation's very existence. Taken together, they are a leading symptom of the economic breakdown which has been caused by the policies which have prevailed, not just since 1978, but for the 28 years since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. - What Is Required? - The transportation network is to the economy as a whole as the arteries and veins of the circulatory system are to the body. It ought to be capable of moving goods and people where they are needed, in the most timely and effective way. By the end of the 1980s, the U.S. transport network as a whole was moving about 5 billion tons of goods through the economy every year. This can be assumed to approximate the total physical goods throughput of the economy. Truck movements accounted for over 40% of the total, rail for about 28%, pipelines for about 17%, and the waterways for about 12% ({Figure 4}). Approximately half of the total freight moved was accounted for by the combination of coal shipments and movements of crude oil and refined petroleum products. Grain shipments, at about 13% of the total, were the next largest commodity item shipped. About 56 tons of goods moved through the economy for each household in the nation. Not since the 1950s has the per-household volume of goods shipped been so low. Back in 1967, 82 tons of freight were shipped, by all modes of transportation, for each of the country's households. This was the highest level reached in the postwar period ({Figure 5}). The transport network's capacity to deliver the goods has collapsed since then by more than 30%, though over the same period the number of people per household has also collapsed by more than 20%, from 3.4 to 2.7. To reverse this collapse would require a transport grid with the capacity of moving between 6.5 and 7 billion tons of goods per year, and an economic policy which would create the employment opportunities which would permit the needed goods to be produced. If the total goods moved are divided by the goods-producing operatives of the manufacturing sector, 450 tons of product enter into circulation for each person productively employed. To produce the increase which would restore the per-household goods throughput of the late 1960s requires the capital investment to create in the range of from 3.5 to 4.5 million new productive jobs in the manufacturing sector. LaRouche's present campaign commitment to create 6 million jobs in basic economic infrastructure and manufacturing would set a floor for the present capacity required to move freight at about 8 billion tons per year, or nearly 90 tons of goods moved per household, per year. - How Do We Compare? - How does this compare with other developed economies? In the late 1960s, the transportation systems of both Japan and Germany moved roughly the same volume of goods per household per year as the United States. By the late 1980s, Germany's transport grid had grown to the point that 114 tons, double the U.S. level, was being transported per household. Japan was transporting 170 tons per household, more than three times the U.S. volume ({Figure 6}). Both countries produce for export, to pay their way in the world. A U.S. economy which was functioning as a world-class exporter would be generating between 10 and 15 billion tons of goods to be shipped each year. As the nearly 200-year history of national infrastructure development in the United States attests, infrastructure, like transportation, ought to be built to last, not from year to year, but from generation to generation. What should be on the agenda now is not simply the matter of what volume of goods and passengers we ought to be capable of moving through the transport grid, but what kind of grid ought we to be designing and building now, to be improved on over the period from 2020-2050. This, after all, is simply considering in what shape the country will be during the adult lifetimes of our grandchildren and their children. Deregulation and budget-cutting has brought us to the point that merely fixing up the system is no more possible. The nation's infrastructure needs a massive overhaul, with a price tag of trillions of dollars. If LaRouche was right, then those who opposed, or ignored him, were wrong. Have we learned our lesson? - And, the Solution - The cheapest mode of transportation is by water, but water-borne commerce is limited in speed, such that the mode is suited to movements of those bulk goods, such as coal and grain, which do not require speedy delivery. For most other purposes, rail ought to be the mode of choice. The standard for assessing relative costs is provided by the measurement of how many tons each mode can move how many miles in an hour. On this basis, a two-track railroad operating three trains an hour, at only 60 miles per hour (mph), moves the same bulk of goods as far in an hour as a fleet of 330 20-ton trucks driven at 60 mph for an hour. Relative labor and energy costs follow from this performance ratio. Additionally, the same two-track railroad requires only one-twelfth the land area of the highways used by trucks. Since the speed of trucks is relatively bounded by the limitations of internal combustion engines, the advantage in favor of rail increases dramatically with increases in speed. Diesel engines cannot function above 125 mph. But high-speed rail systems function for passenger traffic at speeds in the range of 200 mph. France, with its Train a@ag Grande Vitesse and Japan with the Shinkansen, have pioneered the development of rapid rail transit over the last 20 years. The next step, being pioneered in Germany, France, and Japan, is employing the technology of magnetic levitation, in which passenger and freight trains can reach 300 miles per hour travelling without friction along a cushion of air generated between the train and the track. European nations are now moving to construct a high-speed rail network which will integrate their continent from east to west and north to south. The United States should undertake to develop such high-speed rail systems, with the objective of rebuilding the railroad system as the freight mover of choice. This high-speed rail network should be interfaced with water transport, through ocean and internal waterway ports, to take advantage of the benefits of both modes for rebuilding the country's industrial base. Our program to rebuild the nation's transportation grid should begin with the depression-ravaged areas along the Eastern Seaboard, the area known since 1978 as the ``rust belt,'' bounded by the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, and centered on Chicago, and the area bounded by the Tennessee, Tombigbee, and Mississippi Rivers. ---- John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com