Change At The White House By NEAL KNOX WASHINGTON, D.C. (June 3) -- They don't call him "Slick Willie" for nothing. The nickname isn't just derogatory; it's descriptive. This city's eyes bulged and jaws dropped when President Bill Clinton appointed David Gergen as his communications director. He gave a key policy-making and policy-implementing role to a guy who had done the same sort of thing for the last three Republican Presidents. Gergen (who is moderately anti-gun but not a flag-waver) is now Counselor to the President -- which is the same title given by President Ronald Reagan to his friend and powerful confidant Ed Meese. Bringing Gergen into the White House -- and into an exclusive five-person circle composed of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Vice President Al Gore and Chief of Staff Mack McLarty -- is the equivalent of President Reagan bringing President Carter's communications director Jodie Powell into the Reagan, Nancy, Meese inner circle. It's a tossup as to whether Liberal Democrats or Conservative Republicans are more upset -- but the conservatives aren't surprised; Gergen was never a Reaganite. This isn't just another game of Washington musical chairs; and it is important to gun owners -- mainly because bringing a nominal Republican into the inner circle indicates how far Clinton will go to preserve his Presidency. (Not only does the appointment tell us a great deal about Clinton, it also tells us a lot about Gergen -- the ultimate Washington insider, and member, naturally, of the elitist Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission.) The Clinton Administration is in serious trouble, thanks to his largest-ever tax increase and coming even-more-expensive socialized medicine plan, radical policies (like homosexuals in the military and women in combat) and arrogant screwups like getting a $200 haircut on Air Force One while common people circled two closed runways at LAX. Whether Gergen will actually help solve the President's problems is less important than the signal the appointment sends: that the "Pragmatic New Democrat" is back. That's the policy image that Clinton rode into the White House, before taking a sharp turn to the Left. I think what Gergen's appointment means is that there has been a palace coup, in which Clinton has wrested his Presidency away from Hillary. That's not necessarily going to help gun owners, for as long as Hillary and her wild-eyed friends were in control they were pushing for the most extreme left positions -- making it likely that we were going to see equally radical "gun control" proposals. Worse is better. It's no secret that it's a lot easier to beat a radical ban- 'em-all bill than something which the public -- and Congress -- perceives as moderate and reasonable, like a simple waiting period (which the "Brady Bill" isn't). Clinton's apparent turn to the political center may mean that we will see nothing more radical than what he has specifically endorsed: the "Brady Bill" (in some version), a military-style firearm ban (in some version), and a ban on magazines of over about 15 rounds. There is also the possibility that he will only do what he said he would do during his State of the Union speech, when he told Congress: "You pass the 'Brady Bill' and I'll sign it." Agreeing to sign a bill is a long way from going all-out to push it through Congress, arm-twisting and vote-trading as he and the White House lobbyists did to get the tax bill through the House. "Gun Control" isn't nearly as important to Bill Clinton as it is to Hillary and her friends; he's far more interested in making a historical record as a great President. Such an ambition can be fulfilled only by big changes in big programs, not by incremental changes in the gun laws. So how does Gergen's appointment -- and the new directions it signals -- affect us gun owners? It's much too early to tell. But it's sure going to affect us. ---- (c) 1993 by Neal Knox and Associates. All Rights Reserved.